HandyNZL, on 09 February 2011 - 06:45 PM, said:
So is our like or dislike or indifference of cars based on subtle marketing ploys, to which we have all succumbed? Or is it we expect Force India to have yet another middle of the pack, not really count for too much season, so we just look at the car indifferently, and frankly can not be bothered to talk about it, instead talking about the weather?
On the flipside, do we discuss other cars with affection, misguided and ignorant technical claptrap, because we have an investment in wanting "our" team to be fighting for the championship, or another type of investment wanting to see the backmarker cars improve?
On the face of it, we care about Team Poochie, Team Lotus, Virgin, McLaren, Ferrari and Red Bull, but Force India, Williams, Sauber, and STR we don't. And the rest have been forgotten about already.....
Er...everybody does it. The problem is not whether people care more about some teams7drivers or not, the problem is when they refuse to acknowledge the impact it has on their own opinion.
That's what bothers me so much when I have to face some "objective" poster. I strive to be as objective as possible (Muzza can attest to this), yet I keep rubbing my preference for Nando and Team Poochie at every post I make. Why? Because I am aware of my bias and I want other people to take that into account. But then someone says "I have no preferences at all. Based on the high moral ground that confers to me, I think that Kazuki Nakajima is better than Ayrton Senna. Your accusations of bias just because I wear a samurai sword and consider myself a proud member of the Tokugawa clan descendants of the great Shoguns is frankly, ridiculous as I just stated that I am objective. You on the other hand, already told us you are a Poochie fan, which invalidates whatever you have to say"