A View On A1 Series!!!
Started by
Wez
, Oct 10 2005 12:58 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 10 October 2005 - 12:58 PM
In my opinion there are a few problems with A1!
The first is more of an observation than a problem, in that all the cars are meant too be equal.
BullSh!t...
Thomas Shekter is one of the best drivers in the IRL and yet he ran midfield behind clowns like yoong (who is useless) & unknowns.
It’s more about the car and the car setup than the drivers (The South African car for example is set up like an 18 wheeler truck).
Secondly the Practice is too drawn out and very boring.
Thirdly the Gap between the good drivers and the bad drivers is extremely vast, which will cause major accidents.
The first is more of an observation than a problem, in that all the cars are meant too be equal.
BullSh!t...
Thomas Shekter is one of the best drivers in the IRL and yet he ran midfield behind clowns like yoong (who is useless) & unknowns.
It’s more about the car and the car setup than the drivers (The South African car for example is set up like an 18 wheeler truck).
Secondly the Practice is too drawn out and very boring.
Thirdly the Gap between the good drivers and the bad drivers is extremely vast, which will cause major accidents.
#2
Posted 10 October 2005 - 01:39 PM
It's OK! I just dislike the sprint race and I dunno, its just not as good as i expected!
IT'S BRITNEY BITCH!!!
#3
Posted 10 October 2005 - 02:39 PM
Maybe Mr Scheckter is poor at setting a car up. And if he's one of the best drivers in IRL then the standard is either very low or he's improved out of all recognition over the last couple of years.
Reading: other peoples posts
Listening to: Cracker - Kerosene Hat

Dig that jive, Jack. Put it in your pocket, and don't look back.
Listening to: Cracker - Kerosene Hat

Dig that jive, Jack. Put it in your pocket, and don't look back.
#4
Posted 10 October 2005 - 02:49 PM
monza gorilla, on Oct 10 2005, 04:39 PM, said:
Maybe Mr Scheckter is poor at setting a car up. And if he's one of the best drivers in IRL then the standard is either very low or he's improved out of all recognition over the last couple of years.
I think SA have the muppets setting up their car,
He's an extreamly quick driver, Infact a couple of years ago he led nearly the entire Indy 500 before his car let go. I gaurantee you he's better than 90% of the A1 drivers(including Piquet Jnr).
Edited by Wez, 10 October 2005 - 02:49 PM.
#5
Posted 10 October 2005 - 03:00 PM
Wez, on Oct 10 2005, 03:49 PM, said:
I think SA have the muppets setting up their car,
He's an extreamly quick driver, Infact a couple of years ago he led nearly the entire Indy 500 before his car let go. I gaurantee you he's better than 90% of the A1 drivers including Piquet Jnr).
He's an extreamly quick driver, Infact a couple of years ago he led nearly the entire Indy 500 before his car let go. I gaurantee you he's better than 90% of the A1 drivers including Piquet Jnr).
I don't dispute that!
Reading: other peoples posts
Listening to: Cracker - Kerosene Hat

Dig that jive, Jack. Put it in your pocket, and don't look back.
Listening to: Cracker - Kerosene Hat

Dig that jive, Jack. Put it in your pocket, and don't look back.
#6
Posted 10 October 2005 - 08:38 PM
Jenson_Rules!!!, on Oct 10 2005, 02:39 PM, said:
It's OK! I just dislike the sprint race and I dunno, its just not as good as i expected!
Here's the thing...
When something gets all the media hype that A1 Grand Prix has had, it's going to be hard to live up to, and even harder to consistently live up to IF it manages it at first. Almost a setup for a fall really.
That said, I blame the media and NOT the organisers (or at least the media more than the organisers) as every interview with the organisers that I have heard didn't play it up as much as say BSkyB (who's sports channels show it in the UK) who's ads basically did everything BUT make the statement "This WILL be better than F1". I also know every newspaper I read that day had 'fair comparisons' (which of course were unfair or untrue) between A1 and F1, despite the fact the organisers had said they did NOT want to compete with Bernie (why else put A1 on largely in F1s off-season?). The organisers also emphasised the differences in CONCEPT, things such as no driver actually scores points, just the countries/teams which BSKYB did not do.
In a way they also had a case of bad timing, because the very day A1 debuted at Brands Hatch, Formula One got it's first new champion for 5 years.
Seems to me that the wider media attention on A1 faded almost the day after it's debut. Brands got a five minute slot on Radio1 Newsbeat, whereas yesterdays race barely scraped a mention, probably extended by the fact britain did well, and they said more about F1 Japanese GP.
FIA Safety Warning: Kimi Raikkonen can seriously damage the Health of your Engine.
#7
Posted 11 October 2005 - 06:32 AM
Wez, on Oct 10 2005, 04:58 PM, said:
In my opinion there are a few problems with A1!
The first is more of an observation than a problem, in that all the cars are meant too be equal.
BullSh!t...
Thomas Shekter is one of the best drivers in the IRL and yet he ran midfield behind clowns like yoong (who is useless) & unknowns.
It’s more about the car and the car setup than the drivers (The South African car for example is set up like an 18 wheeler truck).
Secondly the Practice is too drawn out and very boring.
Thirdly the Gap between the good drivers and the bad drivers is extremely vast, which will cause major accidents.
The first is more of an observation than a problem, in that all the cars are meant too be equal.
BullSh!t...
Thomas Shekter is one of the best drivers in the IRL and yet he ran midfield behind clowns like yoong (who is useless) & unknowns.
It’s more about the car and the car setup than the drivers (The South African car for example is set up like an 18 wheeler truck).
Secondly the Practice is too drawn out and very boring.
Thirdly the Gap between the good drivers and the bad drivers is extremely vast, which will cause major accidents.
I have seen a lot of problems during the pitstop. The pit crew is strugling to remove the wheel nuts most of the times. Its happening with almost all the teams. i read in pitpass that this will be sorthed out very soon.
The live telecast we are getting in Middle East through Al Jazeera Sports is pathetic. First of all there is no English commentary. The on board cameras are very dark and not clear at all. The informations we are getting on the television is very less and difficult to understand. I dont know whether this is a problem only with Middle East transmission or not.
Any way so far A1 is noteven 50% up to the expectation.
#8
Posted 27 June 2009 - 02:36 AM
“To be or not to be”. Outside the Bible, there six words are the most famous in all the literature of the world. They were spoken by Hamlet when he was thinking aloud, and they are the most famous words in Shakespeare because Hamlet was speaking not only foe himself but for every thinking man and woman. To be or not to be-to live or not to live, to live richly and abundantly and eagerly, or to live dully and meanly and scarcely. A philosopher once wanted to know whether he was alive or not, which is a good question for everyone to put to himself occasionally. He answered it by saying:“I think, therefore I am.”(wow gold)
But the best definition of existence I ever saw was one written by another philosopher who said:“To be is to be in relations.”If this is true, then the more relations a living thing has, the more relations a living thing has, the more it is alive. To live abundantly means simply to increase the range and intensity of our relations. Unfortunately we are so constituted that we get to love our routine. But apart from our regular occupation how much are we alive? If you are interested only in your regular occupation, you are alive only to that extent. So far as other things are concerned-poetry and prose, music, pictures, sports, unselfish friendships, politics, international affairs-you are dead.
Contrariwise, it is true that every time you acquire a new interest-even more, a new accomplishment-you increase your power of life. No one who is deeply interested in a large variety of subjects can remain unhappy, the real pessimist is the person who has lost interest.
Bacon said that a man dies as often as he loss a friend. But we gain new life by contacts, new friends. What is supremely true of living objects is only less true of ideas, which are also alive. Where your thoughts are, there will your life be also. If your thoughts are confined only to your business, only to your physical welfare, only to the narrow circle of the town in which you live, then you live in a narrow circle of the town in which you live, then you live in a narrow circumscribed life. But if you are interested in what is going on in China, then you are living in China; if you are interested in the characters of a good novel, then you are living with those highly interesting people; if you listen intently to fine music, you are away from your immediate surroundings and living in a world of passion and imagination.wow gold
To be or not to be-to live intensely and richly, or merely to exist, that depends on ourselves. Let us widen and intensify our relations. While we live, let us live!
But the best definition of existence I ever saw was one written by another philosopher who said:“To be is to be in relations.”If this is true, then the more relations a living thing has, the more relations a living thing has, the more it is alive. To live abundantly means simply to increase the range and intensity of our relations. Unfortunately we are so constituted that we get to love our routine. But apart from our regular occupation how much are we alive? If you are interested only in your regular occupation, you are alive only to that extent. So far as other things are concerned-poetry and prose, music, pictures, sports, unselfish friendships, politics, international affairs-you are dead.
Contrariwise, it is true that every time you acquire a new interest-even more, a new accomplishment-you increase your power of life. No one who is deeply interested in a large variety of subjects can remain unhappy, the real pessimist is the person who has lost interest.
Bacon said that a man dies as often as he loss a friend. But we gain new life by contacts, new friends. What is supremely true of living objects is only less true of ideas, which are also alive. Where your thoughts are, there will your life be also. If your thoughts are confined only to your business, only to your physical welfare, only to the narrow circle of the town in which you live, then you live in a narrow circle of the town in which you live, then you live in a narrow circumscribed life. But if you are interested in what is going on in China, then you are living in China; if you are interested in the characters of a good novel, then you are living with those highly interesting people; if you listen intently to fine music, you are away from your immediate surroundings and living in a world of passion and imagination.wow gold
To be or not to be-to live intensely and richly, or merely to exist, that depends on ourselves. Let us widen and intensify our relations. While we live, let us live!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











