Jump to content



- - - - -

Toyota Tf107


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#31 erichbarto

erichbarto

    Rookie Driver

  • Junior Members
  • 54 posts
  • Location:Long Island, New York, USA

Posted 14 January 2007 - 12:27 AM

looks the same as always, you think if Toyota wanted to generate new interest in the team, and attract more fans and sponsors they would make some radical livery changes to turn heads.. guess not.

#32 Autumnpuma

Autumnpuma

    Back in black

  • Senior Members
  • 8,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

Posted 14 January 2007 - 02:29 AM

View Posterichbarto, on Jan 13 2007, 04:27 PM, said:

looks the same as always, you think if Toyota wanted to generate new interest in the team, and attract more fans and sponsors they would make some radical livery changes to turn heads.. guess not.

Toyota does boring really, really well these days. The Corolla is so boring that my eyes just slide off it. I'm an artist and pride myself on my visual memory, but damned if I can remember what the Corolla looks like.....


.....it's just the same with the Toyota F1 cars. I know they look like the other F1 cars in basic shape, but there's nothing remotely exciting about that car. Hell, even the Super Aguri, using a similar colour scheme, is more exciting.
Don't rest in peace, Bruce. Raise Hell.
Posted Image
______
Give me a roof over my head, some food to eat and a fast car. That's all I need.
That's all I'll ever need.
----Robert Kubica


"Gilles was the last great driver. The rest of us are just a bunch of good professionals."
----Alain Prost


The only true sports are motor racing and mountain climbing; everything else is just a game.

TF1 Blogs: be afraid, be very, very afraid..........

#33 funkejay

funkejay

    F1 Ace

  • Members
  • 1,033 posts
  • Location:across the pond

Posted 14 January 2007 - 07:50 AM

Off the top of anyone's head - Were the upper wishbones on the front of the TF106 as heavily contoured as the TF107?? I don't remember them undulating as much, but (to be entirely honest) I didn't pay much attention to the front end of their car last year.
"Schumacher has said he does not want to do anything bad or for anything bad to happen in this race, so I just hope that is what happens for his sake - but this shows how far Ferrari are prepared to go to help Michael win this Championship."

JV - Oct 25, 1997 - after Saturday Practice in the final round of the 1997 championship at Jerez, Spain. The next day would prove just how far Schumi was willing to go...................

Posted Image

#34 Autumnpuma

Autumnpuma

    Back in black

  • Senior Members
  • 8,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

Posted 14 January 2007 - 07:58 AM

View Postfunkejay, on Jan 13 2007, 11:50 PM, said:

Off the top of anyone's head - Were the upper wishbones on the front of the TF106 as heavily contoured as the TF107?? I don't remember them undulating as much, but (to be entirely honest) I didn't pay much attention to the front end of their car last year.

Hey Jay! I noticed that too and I think it's new.
Don't rest in peace, Bruce. Raise Hell.
Posted Image
______
Give me a roof over my head, some food to eat and a fast car. That's all I need.
That's all I'll ever need.
----Robert Kubica


"Gilles was the last great driver. The rest of us are just a bunch of good professionals."
----Alain Prost


The only true sports are motor racing and mountain climbing; everything else is just a game.

TF1 Blogs: be afraid, be very, very afraid..........

#35 c21

c21

    F1 Ace

  • Members
  • 1,327 posts
  • Location:Who knows?

Posted 14 January 2007 - 12:57 PM

View Postfunkejay, on Jan 14 2007, 08:50 AM, said:

Off the top of anyone's head - Were the upper wishbones on the front of the TF106 as heavily contoured as the TF107?? I don't remember them undulating as much, but (to be entirely honest) I didn't pay much attention to the front end of their car last year.


Its just a different shape fairing over the wishbone. the actual strut runs strait through it.
Quiet one:
"I have officially addded you to my enemies list, along with Schumacher, Todt, Ecclestone, Bill Gates and that annoying biker frog."

#36 Autumnpuma

Autumnpuma

    Back in black

  • Senior Members
  • 8,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:32 PM

View Postc21, on Jan 14 2007, 04:57 AM, said:

Its just a different shape fairing over the wishbone. the actual strut runs strait through it.

Are they shaping that faring for aerodynamic reasons? Thought that was illegal......(I'm thinking of Tyrrell)
Don't rest in peace, Bruce. Raise Hell.
Posted Image
______
Give me a roof over my head, some food to eat and a fast car. That's all I need.
That's all I'll ever need.
----Robert Kubica


"Gilles was the last great driver. The rest of us are just a bunch of good professionals."
----Alain Prost


The only true sports are motor racing and mountain climbing; everything else is just a game.

TF1 Blogs: be afraid, be very, very afraid..........

#37 c21

c21

    F1 Ace

  • Members
  • 1,327 posts
  • Location:Who knows?

Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:39 PM

View PostAutumnpuma, on Jan 14 2007, 07:32 PM, said:

Are they shaping that faring for aerodynamic reasons? Thought that was illegal......(I'm thinking of Tyrrell)

Its certainly for aero reasons. I know what you mean with the rules about that, but to be honest I'm not 100% sure of the wording.

But in the end all wishbones are shaped aerodynamically.

If the FIA were too p**sed about it they could insist that the wishbones be made cylindrical like the old days.

Now I come to think about it, I think that the wishbone shape must by symmetrical IE not in a wing profile and such.
Quiet one:
"I have officially addded you to my enemies list, along with Schumacher, Todt, Ecclestone, Bill Gates and that annoying biker frog."

#38 Player(1)

Player(1)

    Champion Del Mundo!

  • Senior Members
  • 1,512 posts

Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:43 PM

View PostAutumnpuma, on Jan 14 2007, 06:32 PM, said:

Are they shaping that faring for aerodynamic reasons? Thought that was illegal......(I'm thinking of Tyrrell)
my knowledge on this part is very spotty, rings a bell what your saying. However is there a possible definition saying it can be aerodynamic but not a source of downforce? Possible they are shaping both sides the same making the air accelerate around at the same speed to prevent either side generating a lower pressure then the other and therefore no downforce?

Sorry, just thinking out loud with a keyboard.
Posted ImagePosted Image

View Postgoferrarigo, on Apr 17 2007, 11:15 PM, said:

Yeah Kimi should be winning this one,

View PostAutumnpuma, on Apr 19 2007, 03:32 AM, said:

Yeah, that sounds right. Mikey was the well-hung gent to Steve's innocent school-girl.

#39 c21

c21

    F1 Ace

  • Members
  • 1,327 posts
  • Location:Who knows?

Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:46 PM

View PostPlayer(1), on Jan 14 2007, 07:43 PM, said:

my knowledge on this part is very spotty, rings a bell what your saying. However is there a possible definition saying it can be aerodynamic but not a source of downforce? Possible they are shaping both sides the same making the air accelerate around at the same speed to prevent either side generating a lower pressure then the other and therefore no downforce?

Sorry, just thinking out loud with a keyboard.

All the wishbones shoul be a neutral aerofoil, but I see no reason why this neutral shape cannot be used to steer the airflow.

Maybe thats the ruling, im not sure.
Quiet one:
"I have officially addded you to my enemies list, along with Schumacher, Todt, Ecclestone, Bill Gates and that annoying biker frog."

#40 Autumnpuma

Autumnpuma

    Back in black

  • Senior Members
  • 8,830 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:53 PM

View Postc21, on Jan 14 2007, 10:46 AM, said:

All the wishbones shoul be a neutral aerofoil, but I see no reason why this neutral shape cannot be used to steer the airflow.

Maybe thats the ruling, im not sure.

Yeah, that sounds accurate. I think the shape needs to be a neutral airfoil. Any degree of tilt on the back end would cause downforce and that would be illegal. Steering the air is another matter......hmmm......splitting hairs a bit. If the TMD can be ruled illegal because they 'affect' the aerodynamics of the car, can't these new wishbone shapes also be 'affecting' the aero? Certainly the TMD eliminated the tyre vibrations and that, in turn, kept the front wing from bouncing, so couldn't we say the new wishbone shape makes an aerodynamic winglet create downforce better? Where exactly is the difference? They are both elements that affect the downforce. Why is one legal and the other not? I'm p!ssing against the wind here, so don't bother to answer that last!!

Edited by Autumnpuma, 14 January 2007 - 06:54 PM.

Don't rest in peace, Bruce. Raise Hell.
Posted Image
______
Give me a roof over my head, some food to eat and a fast car. That's all I need.
That's all I'll ever need.
----Robert Kubica


"Gilles was the last great driver. The rest of us are just a bunch of good professionals."
----Alain Prost


The only true sports are motor racing and mountain climbing; everything else is just a game.

TF1 Blogs: be afraid, be very, very afraid..........

#41 aussief1

aussief1

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 3,909 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia

Posted 14 January 2007 - 10:34 PM

View Postc21, on Jan 15 2007, 04:46 AM, said:

All the wishbones shoul be a neutral aerofoil, but I see no reason why this neutral shape cannot be used to steer the airflow.

Maybe thats the ruling, im not sure.

Suspension wishbones must have a symmetrical profile for majority of their length.
Posted Image
"Giancarlo, you are still two seconds a lap slower than Fernando, this cannot be possible you have the same fuel load, I know you have some understeer but you cannot be two seconds slower, COME ON"!!!! - Alan Permane, Fisichella�s race engineer, 2006 Australian Grand Prix
"We're lucky we don't build aeroplanes" - Mark Webber on Red Bulls reliability issues at the Australian Grand Prix 2008.
Nathan is: .............. ??

#42 TripleR

TripleR

    Test Driver

  • Junior Members
  • 43 posts
  • Location:Beirut , Lebanon

Posted 30 January 2007 - 10:29 AM

The Toyota haven't change at alll , some tweaks for the body work and the upgrades FIA does ... its still the same since they came into F1 world ! and they're still failing to achieve what they aim for !
Posted Image

TripleR Stands For Red Bull Racing - Renault

#43 JayStorm

JayStorm

    Alonso > F1

  • Members
  • 1,230 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester, England

Posted 30 January 2007 - 12:06 PM

Well i'm happy with them being rubbish, so long as they don't pull out of the sport.

Hmm, I think a new and young driver line-up next year would really help.
Posted Image

#44 jemstride

jemstride

    Lord of the Buttonites

  • Senior Members
  • 9,093 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the united kingdom of great britainland
  • Interests:Bodybuilding, gym

Posted 30 January 2007 - 12:41 PM

the car may look 'boring' but that doesnt mean its slow - toyota could've produced the quickest car for all we know! thats what i love about the start of the new season, everyones predictions are wrong!

#45 JayStorm

JayStorm

    Alonso > F1

  • Members
  • 1,230 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manchester, England

Posted 30 January 2007 - 01:04 PM

Even yours Jem'?

But I suppose you are right, it just doesn't see like they have advanced all that much judging on it's appearance.
Posted Image

#46 bathurst1000

bathurst1000

    Rookie Driver

  • Members
  • 219 posts
  • Location:New South Wales, Australia!

Posted 01 February 2007 - 04:10 AM

But come on when was the last time the runt of the field was the fastest?
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This website is unofficial and is not associated in any way with the Formula One group of companies. F1, FORMULA ONE, FORMULA 1, FIA FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, GRAND PRIX and related marks are trade marks of Formula One Licensing B.V.