why is that nichos? i can understand if it's treatment of jv, or their performance in the pollock era, but apart from dr's handling of jv (if what nojvnof1 is true) i can't see many reasons of disliking their present form. geoff willis is doing great things now..
and remember, it was Craig Pollock who signed Geoff Willis, not David Richards. As for Sato's quali lap of Suzuka, I watched at the local and to say he was all over the place is a massive understatement. The way he was going he looked like the driver he was of 2002, one who always looked like loosing it. He was going through the essess after the start/finish straight and the way he was hacksawing at the wheel was crazy, he nearly lost it about 3 or 4 times and lost so much time.
As for his performances in British F3, seriously, get over it. F3 is not F1. Any of you remember Jan Magnussen. They were calling him the "new Senna" as he won more races than Senna did, but when he came into F1, he was the biggest dissapointment of hyped up F1 drivers EVER. What you do in junior formulas counts for nothing. Look at Webber, if I'm correct he hasn't won any titles that he participated in but is doing well in F1. It doesn't matter what you've won. If you don't perform when given the chance in F1, you're nothing but a never-was. Sato had one good race in 2002, at Suzuka where he had a better engine than any of the other 3 Honda drivers, and thats a fact!! For the other races, he was nothing but an accident waiting to happen. For this year, i'll comment after the first races as he MAY have improved, but we'll see.