KazamaS15, on Jan 19 2008, 03:36 PM, said:
Mike Gascoyne isn't the wonder-boy people make him out to be. He did nothing but clash egos wherever he went...and spread himself too thin trying to be a micro-manager. He's a chassis guy, not management, but his ego won't let him do what he was born to do.
AutoRacer5, on Jan 19 2008, 04:11 PM, said:
The other half is the personnel.
You can have all the good people, but crap owners will zap the team dead.
True where the owner is actually running the team, like Haas in ChampCar, but often irrelevant in current F1 because the owners have no managing influence on how the team is run (with a few notable exceptions). At SA, Preston and Audetto are still in charge of the day-to-day. They were quality before the ownership change and they're still quality.
Sato, on Jan 19 2008, 07:13 PM, said:
goferrarigo, on Jan 19 2008, 08:51 PM, said:
This is not always the case. Shares can be sold and a person/company can hold the majority of shares but the day-to-day running of the team is perfectly stable unless the new owners start firing and hiring people*. That hasn't happened at SA, so we must conclude that it's got the same structure that it previously had. Also, SA doesn't need accountability. They are a sleek, well-organized team that has done wonders with a scant budget.
*McLaren is a prime example of this. Ron Dennis no longer holds the majority share in the team, but he's still the man in charge. There are many ways to structure shares/control in a company.















