All Activity

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Yesterday
  2. Alain Prost says Renault now has "one of the best engines in Formula 1 There are ONLY 3/4 engines in Formula 1 - So NOT a challenge he has a 25% chance of being right - or a quarter. Due to there ONLY being 3/4 engines in Formula 1 - NOT really a challenge is it !!
  3. Last week
  4. Renault saying we have a secret upgrade

    True OJ Simpson knows what you're talking about. Same with McLaren, they got away with secret upgrade last weekend
  5. After ALL the grief Horner and Red Bull gave Renault (even after all the success together). Red Bull QUICKLY jumped ship as quick as they good, using TR to gain Honda power. Ron Dennis worked hard to bring Honda back into F1. Hoping to revive the good times of the previous Mclaren Honda collaboration. That did NOT work out, so Mclaren dropped the works Honda money. Quickly snapped up by TR to in turn provide for Red Bull. With Mclaren going the other way, becoming Renault customers. At this time it is looking like Renault could have the last laugh, getting 1 over on Red Bull. If the Renault PU out performs the Red Bull Honda. It will make Horner look like a £&%# Honda have no excuses not to perform. They can not use new entry excuse. Honda spent a long enough with Mclaren. Bringing Mclaren down with some very forgetable results.
  6. Renault saying we have a secret upgrade

    Like in the real world, in romance ... It is ONLY cheating IF, U get caught, otherwise - U R just, gettin away with it
  7. Renault saying we have a secret upgrade

    That means They cheated then
  8. I have heard rumours from Renault saying we have a secret upgrade. We weren't expecting anything at all to be honest, but it has turned out better than we expected. > I am confused. An upgrade WOULD require an engine CHANGE - with a penalty !!
  9. I have heard rumours from Renault saying we have a secret upgrade. We weren't expecting anything at all to be honest, but it has turned out better than we expected. > I am confused. An upgrade WOULD require an engine CHANGE - with a penalty !!
  10. Mclaren-Renault

    You must read between the lines. That's sarcasm.
  11. Earlier
  12. Mclaren-Renault

  13. Mclaren-Renault

    But that's history. It's 2019 season comparison. Team by Team car by car regardless of that Toxic Alonso who by the way According to Zak Brown isn't welcome back to McLaren unless they run a 3 car team LOL !!
  14. Initial thoughts

    Good for you ! Me neither. i even feel relieved after cancelling my ticket reservations for Suzuka.
  15. Mclaren-Renault

    Why (should compare McLaren with RBR not TR). TR IS what Mclaren gave up to keep Alonso - THEN, works Honda. RBR is just a Honda customer team - Ron Dennis brought Honda BACK into F1 For Mclaren to B the works Honda team - though Honda could NOT deliver at THAT time So Mclaren became a Renault customer to please Alonso - giving him a race winning PU
  16. Initial thoughts

    I have done that and I must say I do not have any withdrawal symptoms LOL
  17. Mclaren-Renault

    You should compare McLaren with RBR not TR
  18. What is Williams doing to Kubica????

    Just One day too OLD and One Hair too BALD.
  19. Alonso

    No seat for Alonso LOL !!! Or he can replace Kubica at Williams Zak Brown says he would need three cars if Alonso wanted to make McLaren F1 return
  20. Initial thoughts

    Good for wallet. I have cancelled my ticket reservation for Suzuka in October. Will be cancelling my Skysports subscription next month.
  21. Initial thoughts

  22. Initial thoughts
  23. Initial thoughts

    If anybody thinks that the rule book is the same now as in 2007 or earlier, you are sadly mistaken. If LH had not breaked (very heavily) there would have have been an accident. Ergo, SV kept his place by leaving the track and impeding - I will say again - intent has nothing to do with it!! On many occasions, we see drivers unintentionally lock up and miss a chicane or ut a corner and have to give up a place or suffer a penalty. This was the same. SV left the track and could only maintain his position by impeding. If Ferrari, were not so incompetent, they would have recognised this as an unfair advantage (no matter how unintentional), asked SV to let LH past, then SV would surely have had the pace to catch and pass LH for the win outright. Just another combination of a SV mistake compounded by poor Ferarri management. Seems to be the story of the season. Am I right in thinking that Kimi is still the last Ferarri champion and the last Ferrari race winner?
  24. Initial thoughts

    Times HAVE changed, with Schumacher racing, it WERE Ferrari International Assistance FIA
  25. Initial thoughts

    yep remember that race... NOBODY complained because it was called RACING. not bloody team principals ego destroying s##t.. Dosen't matter I have saved myself $29 / month by cancelling my floxtel sports package here in aus. I have been frustrated with F1 for way too long. Time to watch paint dry I think.....
  26. Initial thoughts

    For those of you who think this was the right decision by the stewards, go back and re-watch my favorite - Massa vs. Kubica at Fuji in 2007. In the downpour. They each broke several rules, but NOBODY protested or complained. Nobody remembers who won that race, but everybody remembers that short duel. It didn't even matter that Massa won it. It is now a classic.
  27. Initial thoughts

    I miss the times during Senna etc when they go at it and not penalized for simple things like this. They favor Merc too much and not ashamed in showing it to the world ! **** F1 !!
  28. Initial thoughts

    Hear what your saying mate ..... If this little episode of favoritism, to the point of ruining a great race does not spell the death nell of F1 than I do not know what will. They have shot both barrels into both feet this time
  1. Load more activity