Clicky

Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

cavallino

Who Hates Michael Schumacher

as above  

142 members have voted

  1. 1. as above

    • hate him
      96
    • don't hate him
      46


Recommended Posts

It doesn't matter how old I was (I was not born yet), what is important is the fact that senna did the same that Michael does and I see a lot o people talking about senna like if he is God.

That's is what driver do, try to win a any expenses.

So it was written...

Still can afford the dope on your weekly allowanse I see...

Schu is a notorious and proven cheat. What Senna did to Prost and vice versa cannot be explained in the same relative terms as the way Schu bumped Hill and JV (If you know nothing of the rivalry of Prost and Senna I suggest you look up the tread in this section. BTW Prost is the all time best).

And no, bumping competitors out is not what drivers do to win. If that was the case we would see them racing tanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...BTW Prost is the all time best).

:thbup:

And no, bumping competitors out is not what drivers do to win. If that was the case we would see them racing tanks.

Or NASCAR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still can afford the dope on your weekly allowanse I see...

Schu is a notorious and proven cheat. What Senna did to Prost and vice versa cannot be explained in the same relative terms as the way Schu bumped Hill and JV (If you know nothing of the rivalry of Prost and Senna I suggest you look up the tread in this section. BTW Prost is the all time best).

And no, bumping competitors out is not what drivers do to win. If that was the case we would see them racing tanks.

And you say that someone ELSE is smoking the pot, eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And no, bumping competitors out is not what drivers do to win. If that was the case we would see them racing tanks.

Since im not arguing with the 13 year old kid on dope any more...

Yes Ctrl300, the Senna/Prost incidents were very different... Just to show us Shumcher is still a cheat after all these years, he pulled a new stunt in Monaco Qualifying this year, and then in Hungary tried all race to bash Alonso, then Fisichello, then Dela Rosa, Then finally succeded on Heidfeld who like JV in 97 thankfully came out tops!

One more question I would like to know the answer too.... If Shucmacher is so good why does he have it written in his Ferrari contract that no team mate can race him on track?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since im not arguing with the 13 year old kid on dope any more...

Yes Ctrl300, the Senna/Prost incidents were very different... Just to show us Shumcher is still a cheat after all these years, he pulled a new stunt in Monaco Qualifying this year, and then in Hungary tried all race to bash Alonso, then Fisichello, then Dela Rosa, Then finally succeded on Heidfeld who like JV in 97 thankfully came out tops!

One more question I would like to know the answer too.... If Shucmacher is so good why does he have it written in his Ferrari contract that no team mate can race him on track?

You are qiute right. He has never had a truly competitive team mate, and has subequently walzed over the ones he have had making him look very good. He is not giving Massa the hiding many would have anticipated which shows that he is not as great as he ones was or that he never was that great.

He is ultra competitive, and the reason for his policy is that if the car is good he wants to be the one with a chance to walk away with the honours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since im not arguing with the 13 year old kid on dope any more...

Yes Ctrl300, the Senna/Prost incidents were very different... Just to show us Shumcher is still a cheat after all these years, he pulled a new stunt in Monaco Qualifying this year, and then in Hungary tried all race to bash Alonso, then Fisichello, then Dela Rosa, Then finally succeded on Heidfeld who like JV in 97 thankfully came out tops!

One more question I would like to know the answer too.... If Shucmacher is so good why does he have it written in his Ferrari contract that no team mate can race him on track?

Do you know what number one means in a team?

Why those Schumi team mates that you refer to, do not take always the place below Schumi in every race, I mean, the contrac say they can not race against Schumi, but they can be closer as posible and they don't do that eather, so I don't beleive they can beat Schumi, they never were a threat to Schumi, and they don't even win those races were Schumi is a DNF, so the contrac may be a little different from what you say, or they can not really be at Schumi's level a the race track.

Now it's up to you to tell me, the truth about this.

You are qiute right. He has never had a truly competitive team mate, and has subequently walzed over the ones he have had making him look very good. He is not giving Massa the hiding many would have anticipated which shows that he is not as great as he ones was or that he never was that great.

He is ultra competitive, and the reason for his policy is that if the car is good he wants to be the one with a chance to walk away with the honours.

Ferrari is a so ever good car, that before Schumi they spend 19 years trying in vain to get the champioship and they couldn't get it, and you know, they had a fortune teller, that told them that they become this good if they give that kind of contract to Schumi, please, what are you thinking.

Why Alboreto, Alessi or Berger didn't win a championship in those so good Ferraris? don't you say that the car is the good one.

Sorprised? There's no more blind...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course he should get credit for making the car more competitive, but you missed my point. He wanted the clause in his contract so that if or when the car was/became good he would be the one to get the honour and not some team mate whom in MS's opinion did not deserve anything but the occasional glory when he (MS) had mishaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course he should get credit for making the car more competitive, but you missed my point. He wanted the clause in his contract so that if or when the car was/became good he would be the one to get the honour and not some team mate whom in MS's opinion did not deserve anything but the occasional glory when he (MS) had mishaps.

You said it all, if he is making the car more competive he is the one who should take advantage of that.

I think that every team wants to win, if Ferrari knows that another driver can beat Michael and can do a better job than him why would they stop him from doing what they are looking for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When Senna died his Williams was the best car still
No it wasn't.
Williams was so good that Damon hill won a championship with it

That was 2 years later.

he got a great car in everyone of his championships, he won with Lotus, Olivier Panis won in Monaco with a Prost, anybody can win a race one day, Jean Alessi won a race on his birthday, by the way, Button just won one race, that doesn't mean anything
He won more than one race with Lotus plus took the car, which was far inferior than the Williams and McLaren close to the title.
Schummi is Senna's hero.

Suuuuurrrreeee he is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No it wasn't.

That was 2 years later.

He won more than one race with Lotus plus took the car, which was far inferior than the Williams and McLaren close to the title.

Suuuuurrrreeee he is.

Thank you, nojvnof1... Exactly right.

Senna also pushed Prost for the championship driving a car that was light years behind both Prosts Williams & Schumachers Benetton in 1993.... But since Schumikonen was only about 2 then, that probably doesnt count :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No it wasn't.

That was 2 years later.

He won more than one race with Lotus plus took the car, which was far inferior than the Williams and McLaren close to the title.

Suuuuurrrreeee he is.

Williams wans't he best car at that moment you said, now I know who is smoking crack.

Can you tell me when Mansell and Prostwon thier championship with Willimas?

Let me help you I think it was on the two previeous years at Senna's death.

Can you tell me why FIA ban the electronic aids at that time 1993? maybe you don't remember that they did it just becuase Williams was unbeatable.

You need to read more, watch some videos, and stop believing everything you read in forums.

Willimas just lost to Benneton beacuse they didn't have a real driver in the team, they were fighting just beacuse their car was so good, that the truth. believe it or not.

Thank you, nojvnof1... Exactly right.

Senna also pushed Prost for the championship driving a car that was light years behind both Prosts Williams & Schumachers Benetton in 1993.... But since Schumikonen was only about 2 then, that probably doesnt count :lol:

Please stop smoking those thing, they can kill you.

Mclaren was one of the tops team in that time, that why Senna, Prost and Nikki Lauda won seven world champioship, please read cause don't remember or Do I have to post a list of the past championships in here so you can know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Williams wans't he best car at that moment you said, now I know who is smoking crack.

Can you tell me when Mansell and Prostwon thier championship with Willimas?

Let me help you I think it was on the two previeous years at Senna's death.

Can you tell me why FIA ban the electronic aids at that time 1993? maybe you don't remember that they did it just becuase Williams was unbeatable.

You need to read more, watch some videos, and stop believing everything you read in forums.

Willimas just lost to Benneton beacuse they didn't have a real driver in the team, they were fighting just beacuse their car was so good, that the truth. believe it or not.

Please stop smoking those thing, they can kill you.

Mclaren was one of the tops team in that time, that why Senna, Prost and Nikki Lauda won seven world champioship, please read cause don't remember or Do I have to post a list of the past championships in here so you can know.

To say Damon Hill was not a top driver is beyond hilarious. He only lost the 94 championship by one point, and that was after Schu wrecked his car while he was passing him for the lead and what would have been the deserved title. He finished runner up in 95, and in 96 he won it, at the ripe old age of 36.

You seem to be dragging all types of F1 periods into comparison in order to defend your driver. Remember, during the 80's and 90's things changed a lot. And in Schus defense he has managed to win no matter what they have been throwing at him during his carreer. But he is a ruthless competitor, which is why people hate (or dislike) him. No one is questioning his talent, its just that he has, in many F1 fans opinion, brought F1 into disrepute by his on track behaviour. Also, many question his clause of not having a potent team mate, which has resulted in his true talent not being measured as he has not been forced to face a Prost, Senna, Hill or Kimi in the same machinery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To say Damon Hill was not a top driver is beyond hilarious. He only lost the 94 championship by one point, and that was after Schu wrecked his car while he was passing him for the lead and what would have been the deserved title. He finished runner up in 95, and in 96 he won it, at the ripe old age of 36.

You seem to be dragging all types of F1 periods into comparison in order to defend your driver. Remember, during the 80's and 90's things changed a lot. And in Schus defense he has managed to win no matter what they have been throwing at him during his carreer. But he is a ruthless competitor, which is why people hate (or dislike) him. No one is questioning his talent, its just that he has, in many F1 fans opinion, brought F1 into disrepute by his on track behaviour. Also, many question his clause of not having a potent team mate, which has resulted in his true talent not being measured as he has not been forced to face a Prost, Senna, Hill or Kimi in the same machinery.

Hill did what he did just because of the Williams that he was driving, and that's it, He is the only driver that lost a championship in that almighty Williams that saw Mansell 1992, Prost 1993, Hill 1996 and Villenueve 1997 winning, he does not deserve to be called a top driver and you know that, Senna was a top driver, like Prost, Mansell, Piquet, Lauda but Damon hill does not belong to that kind of drivers.

Just take a look at how many years he had that Williams and he just got the title once and he was a test driver when he start driving so he was not so rookie like Jaques in his fisrt year and his outstanding rookie season and getting the pole in the first race and loosing the race just because of a oil leak.

Hill was just a locky driver.

Schumi won races were Senna was in the track and Prost too and Mansell too, they all had better cars thatn him and don't forget that Senna lovers always talk abuot that one and only race that senna won with a Lotus so don't tell me know about the car that Senna had in 1992 when Schumi ended in front of him in the championship and in 1994 when he beat Senna in the fisrt three races, and I am not including here Senna's experience compare to Schumi experience a that time.

Now you tell me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still can afford the dope on your weekly allowanse I see...

Schu is a notorious and proven cheat. What Senna did to Prost and vice versa cannot be explained in the same relative terms as the way Schu bumped Hill and JV (If you know nothing of the rivalry of Prost and Senna I suggest you look up the tread in this section. BTW Prost is the all time best).

And no, bumping competitors out is not what drivers do to win. If that was the case we would see them racing tanks.

you didn't believe me when I said it, now Jaques Villenueve said the same that I did, that Senna did some dirt trick too, here are his words

"Senna played dirty tricks too but he did it with more class, more integrity.

"When he took Prost out [in the Japanese Grand Prix] at Suzuka in 1990, he said he was going to do it before the race," said Villeneuve, who is expected to retire from F1 following BMW Sauber's decision to drop him last month.

Villeneuve beat Schumacher to the 1997 world title

"So, unlike Michael, who ridiculously insisted he was innocent at Monaco this year, Senna said, 'Yes, I did it. But I told you before the race that I was going to do it.'

"That's very different from what Michael did at Monaco and Jerez [in 1997] and Adelaide [in 1994 where he collided controversially with Damon Hill].

"Senna wasn't lying to the fans. Michael was. And the sad thing is that, of course, the fans accept it - they swear black is white, in fact - just so that they can go on respecting the sport they love. And Michael takes advantage of that loyalty."

The only different thing here is that the person who said these word dislike Schumi. (like all of you)

If his is a lier I don't know and certanly I don't really care as long as he is winning, what I said is that Senna did the same and all of you agree that I was a crack smoker, know there you go and please any answer concerning this should be redirected to JV who said it know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hill did what he did just because of the Williams that he was driving, and that's it, He is the only driver that lost a championship in that almighty Williams that saw Mansell 1992, Prost 1993, Hill 1996 and Villenueve 1997 winning, he does not deserve to be called a top driver and you know that, Senna was a top driver, like Prost, Mansell, Piquet, Lauda but Damon hill does not belong to that kind of drivers.

Just take a look at how many years he had that Williams and he just got the title once and he was a test driver when he start driving so he was not so rookie like Jaques in his fisrt year and his outstanding rookie season and getting the pole in the first race and loosing the race just because of a oil leak.

Hill was just a locky driver.

Schumi won races were Senna was in the track and Prost too and Mansell too, they all had better cars thatn him and don't forget that Senna lovers always talk abuot that one and only race that senna won with a Lotus so don't tell me know about the car that Senna had in 1992 when Schumi ended in front of him in the championship and in 1994 when he beat Senna in the fisrt three races, and I am not including here Senna's experience compare to Schumi experience a that time.

Now you tell me...

You know that what you are saying is drivel so why should anyone bother replying to it?

you didn't believe me when I said it, now Jaques Villenueve said the same that I did, that Senna did some dirt trick too, here are his words

"Senna played dirty tricks too but he did it with more class, more integrity.

"When he took Prost out [in the Japanese Grand Prix] at Suzuka in 1990, he said he was going to do it before the race," said Villeneuve, who is expected to retire from F1 following BMW Sauber's decision to drop him last month.

Villeneuve beat Schumacher to the 1997 world title

"So, unlike Michael, who ridiculously insisted he was innocent at Monaco this year, Senna said, 'Yes, I did it. But I told you before the race that I was going to do it.'

"That's very different from what Michael did at Monaco and Jerez [in 1997] and Adelaide [in 1994 where he collided controversially with Damon Hill].

"Senna wasn't lying to the fans. Michael was. And the sad thing is that, of course, the fans accept it - they swear black is white, in fact - just so that they can go on respecting the sport they love. And Michael takes advantage of that loyalty."

The only different thing here is that the person who said these word dislike Schumi. (like all of you)

If his is a lier I don't know and certanly I don't really care as long as he is winning, what I said is that Senna did the same and all of you agree that I was a crack smoker, know there you go and please any answer concerning this should be redirected to JV who said it know.

Listen, I never said i approved of Senna's actions either, but I think what Schu has shown is worse than what Senna did.

In 89 it's really a racing incident between two hard headed team mates, where Senna eventually got the blame as he was behind Prost and off the racing line when they collided. In 90 Senna took out Prost as payback for 89 (which is ludicris as he was to blame for the crash) but also for the stewards not letting him get it his way and start from pole on the clean side of the track.

Schu on the other hand blatantly took Hill out when he knew it was that or second. He got away with one murder and later tried it again in 97, only to get arrested. Again in Monaco this year he tried to steal the pole from FA by blocking. And the list goes on.

Listen, both drivers have/had questionable morals, but i, and all non-schu fanatics find him to be the worst of the two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You know that what you are saying is drivel so why should anyone bother replying to it?

Listen, I never said i approved of Senna's actions either, but I think what Schu has shown is worse than what Senna did.

In 89 it's really a racing incident between two hard headed team mates, where Senna eventually got the blame as he was behind Prost and off the racing line when they collided. In 90 Senna took out Prost as payback for 89 (which is ludicris as he was to blame for the crash) but also for the stewards not letting him get it his way and start from pole on the clean side of the track.

Prost fault in 89

Senna fault in 90

Schu on the other hand blatantly took Hill out when he knew it was that or second. He got away with one murder and later tried it again in 97, only to get arrested. Again in Monaco this year he tried to steal the pole from FA by blocking. And the list goes on.

Listen, both drivers have/had questionable morals, but i, and all non-schu fanatics find him to be the worst of the two.

Indeed, Shumi doesnt have just one to his name like you say, he's got an entire list & unlike the above two, lies and claims he is innocent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ctrl300, you said what I say all the time...

"What Senna did to Prost and vice versa cannot be explained in the same relative terms as the way Schu bumped Hill and JV (If you know nothing of the rivalry of Prost and Senna I suggest you look up the tread in this section)."

:clap3:

If you people (AR5 and other Scummi followers) dont understand this is because you didnt "live" those times, I think pump should know this, but maybe he dont remember (age troubles). :) lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ctrl300, you said what I say all the time...

"What Senna did to Prost and vice versa cannot be explained in the same relative terms as the way Schu bumped Hill and JV (If you know nothing of the rivalry of Prost and Senna I suggest you look up the tread in this section)."

:clap3:

If you people (AR5 and other Scummi followers) dont understand this is because you didnt "live" those times, I think pump should know this, but maybe he dont remember (age troubles). :) lol.

Kids, no respect for your elders :nono1:

My take is this, you do what you have to do to win, every driver has done doggey things from the best to the worst. If you are of the elite class your sins are made bigger, if you are of the mid-pack class no one notices just like those drivers and if you are of the bottom class your miss-deeds only go noticed if you take out a top driver............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What many don't understand is that what Senna did to Prost in 1990 could have killed either one of them. It killed an F3000 driver in 1992, Ogawa I think his name was. Same corner, different circumstances.

Look for the video on the internet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You know that what you are saying is drivel so why should anyone bother replying to it?

Listen, I never said i approved of Senna's actions either, but I think what Schu has shown is worse than what Senna did.

In 89 it's really a racing incident between two hard headed team mates, where Senna eventually got the blame as he was behind Prost and off the racing line when they collided. In 90 Senna took out Prost as payback for 89 (which is ludicris as he was to blame for the crash) but also for the stewards not letting him get it his way and start from pole on the clean side of the track.

Schu on the other hand blatantly took Hill out when he knew it was that or second. He got away with one murder and later tried it again in 97, only to get arrested. Again in Monaco this year he tried to steal the pole from FA by blocking. And the list goes on.

Listen, both drivers have/had questionable morals, but i, and all non-schu fanatics find him to be the worst of the two.

You and almost everybody are talking about schumi taking hill out the race in 1994, but what you don't rememder is this, Schumi had a crash with a wall, and hill didn't wait until he came to a complete stop and try to pass him right away in the crash when every driver with a brian in the head would be a little more cautios in a situation like that, Schumi couldn't keep driving his car after he carshed to the wall and Hill that was in second placed at the moment of the crash, try to pass Schumi and they crash, hill continued in the race and his car was running well and he went into the pit, the team told him to stop beacuse of a broken suspention, so Schumi didn't have all the fault on that crash and he didn't took him complete out of the race, but like somebody just said here when you are at the top you sin are bigger.

Was that another surprise for you, keep reading I have more.

Ctrl300, you said what I say all the time...

"What Senna did to Prost and vice versa cannot be explained in the same relative terms as the way Schu bumped Hill and JV (If you know nothing of the rivalry of Prost and Senna I suggest you look up the tread in this section)."

:clap3:

If you people (AR5 and other Scummi followers) dont understand this is because you didnt "live" those times, I think pump should know this, but maybe he dont remember (age troubles). :) lol.

I may have and age problem but I don hae a memory problem, adn it looks like Jaques Villenueve agree with me on that, Why Senna took Prost out, because he was the only one who was making him feeling the heat, why he didn't took out someone else, just because those other do not have a car to fight with him so hey were not a real problem for him, and that's it, there nothing more to explain.

You are still talking about Senna because he is dead and the way he dies, I understand that, but please is enough for answer like this one above, there were nothing different, is the same F1, two driver fighting for the title and one driver taking another out to win, what's the difference, just the names. :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are still talking about Senna because he is dead and the way he dies, I understand that, but please is enough for answer like this one above, there were nothing different, is the same F1, two driver fighting for the title and one driver taking another out to win, what's the difference, just the names. :blink:

Nah, forget it...

cant reason with someone with the "bias" in his own name...

by the way, how old are you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nah, forget it...

cant reason with someone with the "bias" in his own name...

by the way, how old are you?

36 and counting another year in october 8, the same dya that schumi won the first title for Ferrari in Susuka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...