kup

1994 If As Be Alive

38 posts in this topic

Fact: MS-DH after 16 gp were 92-91 pts.

And MS, DH had less points, in case of AS presence.

Way 33%: i gonna cut 1/3 pts from both MS-DH = 61-61

(coz AS, MS, DH - were 3 best drivers as in `93, as in `94, imho)

TOTAL = AS 88, MS 61, DH 61 - just imho ...

Wins = AS 8,5wins, MS 3+1,5 (not more) = 13gp, and DH 3wins (not more).

Wins = AS=8(0+8), MS=5(3+2), DH=3(0+3).

Points = AS=0+88, MS=40+21, DH=7+54

Edited by kup

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: Can, Fra, Hun, Eur (won by MS) - and DH was always 2nd,

so we can say AS can be 1st there ...

Note: Spn, Gbr, Bel, Ita, Por, Jpn (won by DH) - and AS ~ 1st.

Fact: AS were likely to win where DH (Williams) was better.

AS 8 wins at = 16`Aus, 09`Ger, ~all 6gp won by DH. = 8 wins.

MS 5 wins at = 01`Bra, 02`Pac, 03`Rsm, 04`Mnc +1gp (Hun, coz Jos +4pts)

DH 3 wins at = 08`Gbr(P+F), Bel, Ita (coz was no MS, and Jpn was rain (AS) =)

but, so we have a clue that DH will have less pts than MS ...

MS: Can, Hun, Eur - won with Pole and fastlap.

DH: GBR (P+F), and Bel, Ita, Jpn (Fastlap).

=) TOTAL TABLE CLASSIC

AS 0 0 0 0 10+ 20+ 30+ 36

MS 10+ 20+ 30+ 40+ 44 50 56 56

DH 6 6 7 7 13 17 21 31+

= = =

AS 46+ 52 58 64 74+ 84+ 94+ 104+

MS 56 66+ 66 66 66 72 76 76

DH 31 35 45+ 55+ 61 65 71 71

= = =

Edited by kup

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good god, I am blinded by numbers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I got the basic gist but you could've set it out a little more clearly, it's very interesting though.

JS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I have said this before but kup, your posts are incomprehensible. indent them make a spreadsheet use a word document make tables or something. and then take a csreenshot and post it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I got the basic gist but you could've set it out a little more clearly, it's very interesting though.

JS.

I just wonder could it be show-season 1994 if Senna be Oke since Spain ?

and in short my prognosis is like:

AS = 104 pts = 8 wins (maximum)

MS = 76 pts = 5 wins (4start + hun) but minimum !

DH = 71 pts = 3 wins (Gbr, Bel, Ita) same minimum.

in other words if Senna can show all his best (and no Williams failures).

Have somebody other Post-Prognosys about 1994 ?

i`d like to know good analytix (better than mine =) of everybody !

Thanx !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I got the basic gist but you could've set it out a little more clearly, it's very interesting though.

JS.

well yeah i could'nt understand fully what he said. i think it will be better if you use sentences kup, but interesting stuff anway :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx for good words, All =)

but will be more interesting for All

to know other ways of calculating

to compare with mine, right ?

Thanx, awaiting ...

1993 - Prost = 99 pts, AS=73, DH=69; and APH comparsion is 10:7.

Williams was much better than McLeren, imho.

Again, imho, AS was as good driver as AP (i see from 1988-89-90).

So same comparsion ASH = 10:7

DH had 7 pts in first 4 gp of 1994, and 84 in next 12.

AS had 0 in frist 4 gp - and could have 84*10/7 = 120 pts (theory)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus, as we know MS make mistakes under pressure:

Aus`94, Eur`97, Aus`05, Tur`05, etc =)

so, imho, AS could catch and pass MS in autumn `94

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just on Senna and Williams. The car was abit of a dog early in the season but by about 2 or 3 races after Imola they had the car sorted out and was much more competitive, apparently the handling was the major problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
just on Senna and Williams. The car was abit of a dog early in the season but by about 2 or 3 races after Imola they had the car sorted out and was much more competitive, apparently the handling was the major problem.

Oke, i agree, we know it by 1994 results =)

but i`d like to ask all to post here other calculatiions than mine

and i`d like it to be much better than mine

but ... i just continue to wait ... and ?

=)

p.s. i just feel myself like Bridgestone in USA`05

i have not best, but imho "system" opinion

and others just says "it is useless, etc"

and no one really can show me better calculations

=)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't disagreeing or commenting on your points system mate, just stating that the Williams as a car was a bad one whilst Senna was there, after his passing, the car underwent a major developmental process which saw it's performance increase significantly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oke, i agree with you, but plz, can you post here your own

1994 Drivers table (if AS be alive).

Thanx.

p.s. you can explain nothing, just post driver`s points, it`s oke =)

and very good if with Who won where in 1994 (just your opinion)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really have no clue and I really don't remember alot of 1994 so I can't make any judgements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This table is non-withstanding.

Most funniest part is by statistic you consider driver who got no points from 3 first races suddenly get minimum 6 from each next one meaning that he would either be 1st or second and *NEVER* fail to finish. I find especially that part unbelievable. Furtheron you seem to give him Schumi victories when Hill finished second? Is that the only criteria or did you also have insight how close to Schumacher Hill was? BTW, dunno how Schumacher was back in Benetton days, but in Ferrari he slowed down when victory was assured in order to preserve his car so looking just at results wont do it imo.

Thats only one of few problems with your statistics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
;) Very good!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if 1994 San-Marino GP was cancelled and removed just after Italy Monza GP ?

I think Senna could win Monaco 7th time, and catch up MS right to removed autumn Imola gp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if? what if? what if? what if the world wasn't round?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What if? what if? what if? what if the world wasn't round?

Yes, pumpdoc, you are right, and you can start another topic, like:

what if the world wasn't round?

By the way: if world for you is earth - this planet is "spheroid" - not round or ball or smth =)

I just want to show that FiA made it very wrong by continuing 1994 Imola GP.

Just ... can you say: do you agree that cancelling in such cases (death !) are anyway better than continuing ?

or you think that nothing can stop current GP even death ?

That`s it !

Edited by kup

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:eusa_think: Life like racing goes on.........................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:eusa_think: Life like racing goes on.........................

Not for Ayrton Senna...

Edited by Senna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not for Ayrton Senna...

Life for the living goes on as does racing.................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Life for the living goes on as does racing.................

why didn't anyone tell the Michelin runners that at Indy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now