Argento Reloaded 1 Report post Posted May 23, 2007 As you can see i was making some math with the WDC! If figures only tell half the truth, now you can see the "half" best of all times! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quiet One 15 Report post Posted May 23, 2007 As you can see i was making some math with the WDC! If figures only tell half the truth, now you can see the "half" best of all times! Great document! Will come in handy in the heat of the battle between drivers! Although I would find it less confusing if the Starts/Wins ratio was calculated the other way (wins/starts instead of starts/wins) But that's just me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goferrarigo 0 Report post Posted May 24, 2007 Nice document, but i don't see how the Gp Starts vs PP help? i think GP wins vs PP would help as it would show how many were dominated.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Argento Reloaded 1 Report post Posted May 24, 2007 Nice document, but i don't see how the Gp Starts vs PP help? i think GP wins vs PP would help as it would show how many were dominated.... We can do many kinds of math but at the end of the day you can see some guys that dominate their era like Fangio, Clark, Stewart, Prost and Senna, Schumacher and even Alonso despite his short career has very good numbers. It will very hard for him to keep number so good. For example Clark "only" won 2 WC but has better number than most with 2 or 3 WC. Or Senna and Stewart numbers vs. Brabham and Piquet...all won 3 WC but despite all WC are...WC it seems some WC are more equal then others! The main purpose of this post is to show wich were the best and to stop praising about good drivers that were/are so far from the bests, like Mansell, Hakkinen, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goferrarigo 0 Report post Posted May 24, 2007 The main purpose of this post is to show wich were the best and to stop praising about good drivers that were/are so far from the bests, like Mansell, Hakkinen, etc. I don't think you can achieve that ever, coz circumstances decide who was in a better car, better time (with little or no opposition). Best is tooo subjective o eliminate any driver on the grid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
F1 FANatic 1 Report post Posted May 25, 2007 I don't think you can achieve that ever, coz circumstances decide who was in a better car, better time (with little or no opposition). Best is too subjective to eliminate any driver on the grid. except for Ide Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cavallino 2 Report post Posted May 25, 2007 The main purpose of this post is to show wich were the best and to stop praising about good drivers that were/are so far from the bests, like Mansell, Hakkinen, etc. Whoa, don't say that, I still have to wear a disguise in public after I said that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quiet One 15 Report post Posted May 25, 2007 Whoa, don't say that, I still have to wear a disguise in public after I said that. Yet, we still recognize you...and that miniskirt you are wearing doesn't makes you justice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goferrarigo 0 Report post Posted May 26, 2007 except for Ide Allways a few exceptions... but seriously who would you want to compare him to?? sato? Yet, we still recognize you...and that miniskirt you are wearing doesn't makes you justice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites