angie 0 Report post Posted July 21, 2007 Not me. I am agreat supporter of the young Guy making good. I predict Lewis 3 or above tomorrow. That will shut the mouths of the "boring ice man" and the Spanish Sore Head Lewis 3rd or above ...well i don't see that happening!and something more.it's ok if you don't support a driver but it is REALLY awful if you speak badly about him! how would it seem to you if someone said all these things about hamilton? I understand that you really support hamilton but just try not to overdo it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Max Mosley 2 Report post Posted July 21, 2007 Not me. I am agreat supporter of the young Guy making good. I predict Lewis 3 or above tomorrow. That will shut the mouths of the "boring ice man" and the Spanish Sore Head Hope you're right mate! Would be great to see him fight through the field. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eric 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2007 The reason we're all pleased to see Lew Ham racing is it is good for the competition and health of the sport. It prevents any negative publicity towards the safety of F1 and will help improve the quality of the racing with him fighting from P10. I don't really like Lewis, I'm kind of anti-Lewis, but it's really good for the on-track action and for the sport to have him racing tomorrow. Plus, no one likes to see a driver injured, regardless. I've been injured as a driver (head injury while doing some indoor-karting), some of my favorite drivers have died in wrecks, and it's really bad. F1's just one big happy super fun family of lovely people who are all unique yet equally wonderful and it's terrible to see one of our own injured. Okay, that last sentence was a bit too much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
reds88 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2007 Good to know hamilton is racing. I reckon 4th is the best he can aim for. It all depends on how well the BMWs will do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AleHop 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2007 Why did they take red flags out and they didn't do when Kubica crashed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikathegreat2 2 Report post Posted July 22, 2007 Why did they take red flags out and they didn't do when Kubica crashed?Erm simple! Hamilton crahsed during quali in which for some reson, pulls out the red flag but Kubica's crash was during a race which does'nt usually force out the red flags, unless he's not moving like Ayrton Senna was'nt! How the hell can you not usderstand the simple rules of Formula 1??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Halfie 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2007 Why did they take red flags out and they didn't do when Kubica crashed? Because they could put the safety car out and control the pace of the race there. In qualifying you cant put a safety car out, there is always more of a preference to use a safety car in a race as opposed to red flags because it will disrupt TV schedules, thats why when you see a crash and expect a red flag its often just the safety car. If you remember when Panis crashed in Canada I think years ago they put the safety car out and then red flagged it when it was over the required distance. The issue as to why Hamilton got the red flag was the car wasnt going to be moved quickly, marshals were in the firing line if moving it, and of course it wont be qualifying if you have to go slow there, no real choice but to red flag. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AleHop 0 Report post Posted July 22, 2007 How the hell can you not usderstand the simple rules of Formula 1??? Thank you Master... I thought safety was always the priority. Relax man, I think they should always take red flags out when those things happen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
