• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Ash

  • Rank
    Veteran Driver

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Location
    South Africa
  1. Welcome XZibit!!!!! Welcome Filipino!!!!! I am a proud Mclaren supporter too. I think Mclaren are going to win all the championships this season. WE should get a clearer picture of who the strong contenders are from the current test.
  2. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    Thanks, Monza. You will not be disappointed. Cheers
  3. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    Murray, you are misinformed and are thicker than two bricks. Unfortunately, there are not that many good ambassadors of the Christian faith, and fair, you base your arguments on that. Who knows the date of their death (except for those who premeditatedly kill themselves)? If you die today, you will know all about it. Russian roulette is a safer option than picking on Christ Jesus and his followers. I'm dead serious. Sounds like a threat?
  4. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    Howzit Wez, it's great to know that your'e a Christian and I know that our arguments are not in vain. I am doing a little research on all the gaps/flaws/missing links in evolution and I will present them by next week. So watch this space ... Cheers Ash
  5. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    It is true, that in the past, so-called-christians, have used the Christian Faith as a 'means to an end' while there were also others who believed and practised what was taught in and by the Bible. The early Christians were martyred for their stand in Christ. He taught that if your'e slapped in one cheek, then turn turn the other as well. To all the intelligent beings out there, it doesn't mean that if I call myself a Christian, I am Christian
  6. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    Have been there and done that
  7. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    I seriously doubt that what I've posted reinforces your beliefs (all credit belongs to yourself) but I do believe that everybody is entitled to their own. But what if their is a God and this God is the creator of the universe/universes and this God requires you to receive His Son, Jesus Christ, in your heart as your Lord and Saviour or else you would spend eternity gnashing your teeth in the 'fiery furnace'. What if? Go to There's some interesting food for thought there ...but only if you ever get hungry. Bye all!!
  8. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    To Jay, Cavallino, and everybody else that matters: I deliberately stirred this argument .... for one simple reason ...reason ....reason. I know the following is quite long but it seems that quite a few here loves reading. I would have put the following in my own words but felt it more appropriate to 'copy & paste'. Here goes .... Enjoy!!! And by the way, I tolerate many world views, idiologies, theoligies, religions (and I believe Evolutionism is one of them) but it is extremely hard for me to respect any one of them except One. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Creationist's Challenge To Evolutionists Author: Robert Congelliere In Time Magazine, August 23, 1999, evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould asserted that "evolution is as well documented as any phenomenon in science" and "we can call evolution a 'fact'". This is typical of the stratagem used by evolutionists: If you make a statement strong enough and repeat it often enough, you may be able to convince yourself and others that it may be true. I would like to remind evolutionists that, despite their dogmatism, there are many knowledgeable people who do not believe that the evidence supports the theory of evolution. One of the most-powerful pieces of evidence against evolution is the fossil record. If evolution occurred by slow, minute changes in living creatures, there would be thousands of times more transitional forms of these creatures in the fossil beds than complete forms. Since the billions of fossils that have been found are all complete forms, the obvious conclusion is: Evolution has never occurred! Though evolutionists have stated that there are many transitional forms, this is simply not true. What evolutionists claim to be transitional forms all have fully functional parts. A true transitional form would have non-functioning parts or appendages, such as the nub of a leg or wing. (1) Where are the trillions of fossils of such true transitional forms? Critics of creationism often say that creationism is simply religion, whereas evolutionism is based on science. The Bible says in Genesis 1 that all creatures reproduce "after their kind" (no change to another kind, i.e., no transitional forms). So the complete absence of transitional forms in the fossil record supports creationism. (2) Is this scientific evidence for creationism, or isn't it? I have also noted that evolutionists only discuss this subject in the broadest terms. If evolution is true, why don't they give us answers to questions such as these: (3)Where did all the 90-plus elements come from (iron, barium, calcium, silver, nickel, neon, chlorine, etc)? 4) How do you explain the precision in the design of the elements, with increasing numbers of electrons in orbit around the nucleus? (5) Where did the thousands of compounds we find in the world come from: carbon dioxide, sodium chloride, calcium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, oxalic acid, chlorophyll, sucrose, hydrogen sulfide, benzene, aluminum silicate, mercaptans, propane, silicon dioxide, boric acid, etc.? How was it determined how many bonds each element would have for combining with other elements? When did these compounds develop from the elements (before the big bang, during the big bang, after the big bang)? When evolutionists use the term "matter", which of the thousands of compounds are included? When evolutionists use the term "primordial soup", which of the elements and compounds are included? Why do books on evolution, including grade-school, high-school and college textbooks not include such important, basic information? Evolutionists are masters of speculation. Why don't they speculate about this? (6) How did life develop from non-life? (7) Where did the human emotions, such as love, hate, and jealousy come from? (8) What are the odds that the evolutionary process, proceeding by random changes, would produce human beings, plus millions of species of animals, birds, fish, and insects, all with symmetrical features, i.e., one side being a mirror image of the other? We take symmetry in all these creatures for granted, but is that a reasonable outcome for a random process? (9) What are the odds that of the millions of species of animals, birds, fish, and insects, a male of each species developed at the same time and in the same place as a female of the same species, so that the species could propagate? (10) Why are there 2 sexes anyhow? This is not foreordained in the evolutionary framework. Is there some sort of plan here? (11) If the first generation of mating species didn't have parents, how did the mating pair get to that point anyhow? Isn't evolution supposed to progress when an offspring of a mating pair has a beneficial mutation? Conclusion: No parents, no evolution. A species would have to jump from a primitive form to a fully developed male and female, each with the ability and instinct to mate. (12) How did the heart, lungs, brain, stomach, veins, blood, kidneys, etc. develop in the first animal by slow, minute steps and and the animal survive while these changes were occurring? For example, did the first animal develop 10% of complete veins, then 20%, and on up to 100%, with veins throughout its entire body and brain? Then how did the heart slowly develop in the animal and get attached to the veins in the right spot? How did the blood enter the system? The blood could not enter before the veins were complete or it would spill out. Where did the blood come from? Did the blood have red corpuscles, white corpuscles, platelets, and plasma? At what point in this process of development did the heart start beating? Did the animal develop a partial stomach, then a complete stomach? After the stomach was formed, how did the digestive juices enter the stomach? Where did the hydrochloric acid as part of the digestive juices come from? What about its kidney and bladder? The animal better not eat anything prior to this. How did the animal survive during these changes? (And over thousands of years?) Of course, at the same time the animal's eyes must be fully developed so it can see its food and his brain must be fully developed so the animal can control its body to get to the food. Like the heart, brain, veins, and stomach, all of the organs and systems in the first animal's body must be fully functional in the first moments of life. This indicates that evolution couldn't occur, and the fossil record indicates that it didn't occur!!! In other words, if you cannot come up with a detailed, feasible scenario of how the first animal developed, the whole evolutionary theory goes out the window, because it never could have even gotten started! Or is your attitude going to be: "Don't bother me with such details. My mind is made up."? (13) Why do books on evolution, including biology textbooks, always start with a fully developed animal when attempting to explain how one species developed into another species? Why don't evolutionists first explain how the first animal developed? (An animal with a heart, lungs, brain, stomach, etc.) (14) What are the odds that the evolutionary process, proceeding by random changes, would produce a system in human reproduction whereby exactly 50% of offspring are male and 50% are female (based on 50% X-chromosomes and 50% Y-chromosomes)? Again
  9. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    Monza, can I tell you a little secret? I am God! Just kidding man, . Cool!!!
  10. Mercedes Engine Commemoration Thread

    I think that Mclaren will sort their problems out. Maybe they're just sandbagging ...
  11. The Official Testing Thread

    It certainly looks like it. Apparently, the HondaV8 packs the most power!!!
  12. Prophet Muhammad Controversy

    I would find myself the lowest of all species to believe that I, and everything else, have evolved from rocks or 'rock soup' over billions of years. Some scientists say that the earth is just over 7 thousand years old while some say that it is millions and millions of years old (obviously to support their evolutionery beliefs). We claim to be intelligent and then we come about the mysterious Big Bang theory, a fairy tale for adults. Where the entire universe was created by a single atom (leave alone where this atom came from ...) exploding. How can we believe that life evolved from 'nothing'. I tell you that it takes greater faith believing in evolution than it does believing in God. The Bible says in the book of Proverbs: 'Only a fool believes in his heart that there is no God'. Evolutionists can't account for alot of thing's (missing links etc.) eg.:
  13. Weekly Wrap

    ... a man after my own heart
  14. Schumacher Says Renault 'Team To Beat'

    One's allowed to dream!
  15. Vodafone Are Mclarens New Title Sponsor

    Yes, me too!