Jump to content



- - - - -

The Most Valuable Teams In Nascar


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 DOF_power

DOF_power

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 2,157 posts

Posted 19 June 2008 - 08:32 AM

The Most Valuable Teams In NASCAR
Jack Gage
forbes.com


Posted Image Posted Image There's a widening gulf in NASCAR between stock car racing's biggest, most valuable teams and those hoping to hang on for just one more race. Since our first NASCAR valuation package two years ago, values have rocketed skyward, up 65% on average, to $119 million, thanks to a rash of investment in a sport whose radical growth over the past decade appears to be sputtering.

In the past year, billionaire investors like George Gillett, the owner of the NHL's Montreal Canadians and English soccer club Liverpool, and Fortress Investment Group     (nyse:       FIG -             news     -             people    ) President Rob Kaufman purchased stakes in teams (Gillett Evernham Motorsports and Michael Waltrip Racing, respectively) after seeing value in NASCAR.

They aren't alone. Stock car racing is also seeing interest from within--mergers of middling teams are yielding ready-made contenders as teams begin to realize the new efficiencies of operating, say, two cars from one expanded shop rather than separately. Example: Ginn Racing teaming with Dale Earnhardt Inc. prior to this season.

Specifically, though, consolidation has put a spotlight on the growing divide between NASCAR's rich and poor. For 2008, the difference between NASCAR's most valuable team and its 15th grew to $307 million, up from $270 million last year, and just $195 million in 2006. That despite a slight decline in values from 2007.

One headwind facing smaller teams: NASCAR's eight-year, $4.48 billion TV deal, which began in 2007, is a 40% improvement, on average, over its previous deal. Catch: It is backloaded and won't pay teams more than they received in 2006 until 2012. For teams like Hendrick Motorsports and Roush Fenway Racing, which operate nine race cars between them, more entries on Sundays mean better odds of cashing in.

We estimate Hendrick Motorsports became NASCAR's most valuable team this year, up 13% to $335 million. Dropping to second is Roush Fenway Racing, which fell 1% in value to $313 million. The value of the third-place team, Joe Gibbs Racing, increased 7% to $184 million.

Posted Image

Worse odds on the track have made it tougher for one- and two-car teams like 10-time Cup Series champion Petty Enterprises, whose protracted and very public search for capital came to an end recently with the announcement it would sell a controlling interest in the team to private equity firm Boston Ventures. We estimate that Petty's two-car operation, which hasn't won a Cup Series race in nearly a decade, fell 9% in value to $44 million this year.

Posted Image


For the Pettys of the NASCAR world, the proof is in the pudding: Whereas nine of NASCAR's top 10 cars in 1998 were operated by teams with fewer than three cars, that number shrank to just four out of 10 by 2003 . Last season had just one among the best 10.

This year, the highest-ranked car owned by a one or two-car team sits at 12th.

In fact, the six most valuable teams (out of 24 total) have thus far accounted for 22 of 54 cars to qualify for a race this year. That’s 41%--and 80% of the top 20 cars in the standings.

  The least valuable quartile controls a mere 11% of qualifying cars this season.

  In a sport that prides itself on parity, the prospect of having only a handful of teams looms large.

Indeed, NASCAR has spent the last five years spinning its wheels to mandate competitiveness by way of its Chase for the Cup playoff format, stricter rules for modifying race cars, and denying team owners formal acknowledgment as franchisees of stock car racing. (The latter would effectively guarantee the opportunity to race, as in other major U.S. sports, instead of requiring each car to qualify weekly.)

Advice to NASCAR brass: Quit legislating competition from the boardroom and let NASCAR's free-styling free market work.

Quote

You start with fuel, you do one stop and it's pretty much a train all the way
Lewis Hamilton


#2 DOF_power

DOF_power

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 2,157 posts

Posted 19 June 2008 - 08:45 AM

Absolutely amazing figures, in the the entire motorsport (business) only the big F1 manufacturer teams are bigger that the big NASCAR teams like HMS or RFR.

A 150 million F1 budget cap would make NASCAR the most expensive/big budget form of motorsport.

Luckily F1 teams will still find ways to burn 300 to 500 million legally or not. Shame it won't be on stuff like active suspensions, active differentials, hydrogen fuel cells, Li-Ion batteries, electric engines, compressed air engines and Co.

Oh well with idiots in charge and legions of idiot "driver skill" fans behind then F1 got what it deserved.

Quote

You start with fuel, you do one stop and it's pretty much a train all the way
Lewis Hamilton


#3 Eric

Eric

    Shakira

  • Validating
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 June 2008 - 07:36 PM

Now you know why I hate NASCAR.  Stock car racing should cost you $50,000/year, not 100s of millions.  If you pay me 100s of millions, though, I might watch NASCAR.  Maybe.

#4 Rainmaster

Rainmaster

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 7,507 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Ning Nang Nong

Posted 20 June 2008 - 05:38 AM

Why does it cost that much money to make a car turn left?
Never stay up on the barren heights of cleverness, but come down into the green valleys of silliness ~ Ludwig Wittgenstein

#5 DOF_power

DOF_power

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 2,157 posts

Posted 20 June 2008 - 06:14 AM

Let me see:

- 3 - 4 cars officially, more unofficially (Robert Yates is the RFR B Team), plus Cup Lit and/or trucks cars
- titanium alloys and/or special plastics from F1 or sportcar/endurance prototypes used for pushrod carburated engines
- F1 CFD software - CFD computers, windtunnels, simulators to produce downforce, sideforce and lower drag,
- trips to Europe to visit/observe F1 facilities
- money for engineers from Europe/Britain witch have previously worked in F1 and/or CART Indycar and/or sportcar-endurance racing

Quote

You start with fuel, you do one stop and it's pretty much a train all the way
Lewis Hamilton


#6 Rainmaster

Rainmaster

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 7,507 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Ning Nang Nong

Posted 20 June 2008 - 06:18 AM

View PostDOF_Renault_BMW, on Jun 20 2008, 07:14 AM, said:

Let me see:

- 3 - 4 cars officially, more unofficially (Robert Yates is the RFR B Team), plus Cup Lit and/or trucks cars
- titanium alloys and/or special plastics from F1 or sportcar/endurance prototypes used for pushrod carburated engines
- F1 CFD software - CFD computers, windtunnels, simulators to produce downforce, sideforce and lower drag,
- trips to Europe to visit/observe F1 facilities
- money for engineers from Europe/Britain witch have previously worked in F1 and/or CART Indycar and/or sportcar-endurance racing

Oh OK.
Never stay up on the barren heights of cleverness, but come down into the green valleys of silliness ~ Ludwig Wittgenstein

#7 DOF_power

DOF_power

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 2,157 posts

Posted 20 June 2008 - 06:23 AM

View PostEric, on Jun 19 2008, 10:36 PM, said:

Now you know why I hate NASCAR.  Stock car racing should cost you $50,000/year, not 100s of millions.  If you pay me 100s of millions, though, I might watch NASCAR.  Maybe.


If you spend 50000 to get a 800 prize what's the point ?!

Quote

You start with fuel, you do one stop and it's pretty much a train all the way
Lewis Hamilton


#8 Eric

Eric

    Shakira

  • Validating
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,466 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 June 2008 - 03:03 PM

View PostDOF_Renault_BMW, on Jun 20 2008, 02:23 AM, said:

If you spend 50000 to get a 800 prize what's the point ?!
Well, it's called fun.  The purse would be much more than $800, cuz no local short track spends that much, except maybe in their first year if they have to buy a truck and trailer.  And, it's all relative.  If you spend $300mil and only get a $150,000 prize, what's the point?  Exactly.  Money comes from sponsors, not from racing.  Sponsors would just pay less than they do now, and have a lot less influence.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This website is unofficial and is not associated in any way with the Formula One group of companies. F1, FORMULA ONE, FORMULA 1, FIA FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, GRAND PRIX and related marks are trade marks of Formula One Licensing B.V.