Edited by lewisthegreat2, 13 May 2011 - 10:42 PM.
Greatest Spectacle In Auto Racing
#1
Posted 05 April 2011 - 10:35 PM

#2
Posted 06 April 2011 - 07:13 AM

#3
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:08 AM
Why a 7 car and an 07? Can't find a number between 1 and 99 that isn't taken by someone else? Just seems stupid.
Why is there not a 1 car in IRL? I can not recall their being one...ever....I might be wrong....
Edited by HandyNZL, 06 April 2011 - 09:08 AM.
#4
Posted 06 April 2011 - 07:14 PM
JHS, on 06 April 2011 - 07:13 AM, said:
Hinchcliffe is, without a doubt, my favorite driver in INDYCAR, and I think he's huge for the sport if they choose to use him for their promotional stuff. Perfect personality, and with the 18-34 demographic being their target, Hinchcliffe is their man. The guy has a personality, but he also brings them out in all the other drivers; so many fans were introduced to the Atlantics and Indy Lights drivers through Hinchcliffe and his Internet presence.
His chances? I'd like them to be high, but I'm cautiously optimistic. Newman/Haas Racing have great equipment, and have qualified well at Indy the last few years, as well as scored good performances on ovals with Rahal and Servià in 2009. However, they weren't a two-car effort last year, so that could be a bit of a strain, and there's a huge jump from Indy Lights to the big cars. Hinchcliffe will learn a lot from Servià , too, so that can speed things up for him. In short, I think Hinchcliffe has a very good shot at being Indianapolis 500 Rookie of the Year (but then again, Hildebrand and Kimball do, too), but I wouldn't be crowning him the winner without rain.
I don't think podiums are out of the question on a road/street track later in the year, though.
HandyNZL, on 06 April 2011 - 09:08 AM, said:
Why a 7 car and an 07? Can't find a number between 1 and 99 that isn't taken by someone else? Just seems stupid.
Why is there not a 1 car in IRL? I can not recall their being one...ever....I might be wrong....
There's a 6 and an 06, too. I don't like the oh-number much, either, but it happens. Newman/Haas didn't want to use 06, but all the low numbers were taken (a lot more surprise Indy-only entries will be announced, so more numbers are taken than meets the eye), and I guess they aren't fans of high numbers. SH Racing (perhaps their sponsor) wanted 7, which is taken, and so is 77, so 07 it was. It's something that's been happening for a long time in American racing and I suppose it always will.
The number 1 is reserved for the championship winning team. They just choose not to take it; numbers have more of a marketing/identity thing in American racing than F1, since they aren't assigned by championship (even moreso in NASCAR than F1, though). Michael Andretti used the "1" in his Indy run in 2006 (the team had it from Wheldon's title in 2005), which is probably the most recent usage. I think Dixon may have taken 1 in 2004 as well.
Edited by lewisthegreat2, 06 April 2011 - 07:15 PM.

#5
Posted 07 April 2011 - 09:42 AM
Why "want" the number 7...Danica has had it for quite a few years now....so this other team just wanted it? That's just dumb....please go and tell them to change, Eric. You're the President and you can do whatever you want.
#6
Posted 07 April 2011 - 08:42 PM
HandyNZL, on 07 April 2011 - 09:42 AM, said:
Why "want" the number 7...Danica has had it for quite a few years now....so this other team just wanted it? That's just dumb....please go and tell them to change, Eric. You're the President and you can do whatever you want.

He did in 2004...
http://en.wikipedia....nd_Driver_Chart

#8
Posted 08 April 2011 - 08:31 PM
HandyNZL, on 08 April 2011 - 05:37 AM, said:
For a car that has not "changed" it's changed quite a bit if you look at today's cars.
Cool stuff, mate...excuse me whilst I go extract my foot from my mouth
The reason it looks so different is that it's the Panoz G-FORCE chassis, not the Dallara IR5. The better looking of the two, but also a bit unsafe, and not getting any updates from Panoz (who were, and still are, in financial trouble and, at the time, working on the DP01) to the point it disappeared. The IR5, too, has changed since introduced in 2003, beyond just the road/street course configuration, so you're still right.

#9
Posted 08 April 2011 - 11:51 PM
Today's cars look quite sexy side on too...was thinking that watching St Pete's race...they just look more like a balanced car than F1 aesthetically....which one performs better is another matter
#10
Posted 09 April 2011 - 12:36 AM
I can't wait for Indy when we get to see the 2012 car with two different aerokits (one oval, one road/street). That design we saw? That was just to demonstrate how aerokits work; it looks nothing like the actual car. Robin Miller claims it's "F1 in the front and Parnelli in the back." I have a feeling it might be really cool, and with less reliance on wings for downforce, I think INDYCAR could be on the verge of the perfectly balanced formula in variety yet close competition as well as overtaking/quality racing. Definitely one of the many exciting things about the 500 this year.
Edited by lewisthegreat2, 09 April 2011 - 12:37 AM.

#12
Posted 09 April 2011 - 01:43 PM
HandyNZL, on 09 April 2011 - 03:18 AM, said:
There will be two cars in the paddock for viewing. They won't be running.

#15
Posted 11 April 2011 - 08:54 PM
Bigger update: Highcroft Racing will field the #16 through Panther Racing for Simon Pagenaud. Should be a good car, and Pagenaud's obviously a great driver, so we'll have to see how he can adapt to oval racing (especially Indy, which is one of the hardest ovals out there).
Bump Day is going to be pretty fun to watch; some good teams/drivers are going to get sent home. With it being the last 500 for the current car, it makes little sense to not enter if you have a Dallara.

#17
Posted 13 April 2011 - 08:51 PM
omg-heikki-ugly.jpg 49.88K
0 downloads The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, where the hell is the ceiling?
I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all nervous and give the wrong answers.
#18
Posted 13 April 2011 - 10:40 PM
Some pre-race festivities: http://www.autoguide...apolis-500.html
Soon to be confirmed: The driver of the Dragon #8. It's someone returning to the sport after a bit of a hiatus. I'm not 100% confirmed on this, but I'd say with confidence that the driver has won the Indianapolis 500 before (if it is who I have been led to believe it is). I say that, of course, and not the name, because the only other guy I think it could be besides the guy I think it is has also won the 500.
Something they're working on: a 33-plane flyover to commemorate the 100th anniversary of this wonderful event. If they do it, that's awesome, and I'll be so freaking jealous of everyone at the track. Flyover's always one of the coolest parts of attending a race; and that's usually just one plane (or, at my local track, an occasional flock of geese

#19
Posted 14 April 2011 - 09:28 PM
Dragon Racing are entered without a driver, as expected. The driver announcement will be soon; really, really sure it's Buddy Rice now.
A mysterious #16 with no information. This was supposed to be Simon Pagenaud, Highcroft, and Panther. However, Panther have a second car, the 44, so I wonder what's going on with Pagenaud's ride.
Raphael Matos and AFS Racing are entered. They'll be doing all the road/street races plus Indy.
Still no driver on the 19 car, but it will be there.
Conquest pull out a 36 car; again driver TBA.
The aforementioned second Panther with nothing confirmed but the number.
A second Sarah Fisher Racing car numbered 57. They only have two cars, so fielding a two-car team would be tough; I doubt it's a garage-space move, so I assume they plan to try to qualify Ed's backup for a Bump Day special if Ed's already in the show.
China Racing and the #89. No one saw that coming. Ho-Pin Tung tested an INDYCAR (numbered 88) with FAZZT over the winter, and wants to run the 500, so I guess. No insider has anything about this team yet, so we'll label it as suspicious.
Number change: Wheldon and Bryan Herta Autosport will use the 98 instead of the 29. There's one team I associate the 98 with, so I wonder...
http://www.indianapo...S_EntryList.pdf
I'm sure we'll see someone else show up last-minute, and perhaps someone not make it, but 42...holy ****!

#21
Posted 15 April 2011 - 09:42 PM
It's official INDYCAR as the sanctioning body of the IZOD IndyCar Series and the Firestone Indy Lights. INDYCAR and IICS work well for referring to the sport.
But yes, INDYCAR is the only thing in American motorsports on an upswing. A lot of good stuff happening there and if they get the new car right, and if VERSUS takes off under the NBC Sports banner, well, the sport of open-wheel racing could get back to being a pretty BFD here.

#23
Posted 16 April 2011 - 02:47 PM

Problem solved.
Also, Sam Hornish, Jr. will not race in the Indianapolis 500. I am relieved.

#24
Posted 16 April 2011 - 08:11 PM
lewisthegreat2, on 14 April 2011 - 09:28 PM, said:
I wondered correctly about CURB/Agajanian's involvement.
http://indycar.com/n...-historic-ties/
Unfortunately, the original livery was infinitely better than this one. The sheer hideousness of the showcar they used (an old IRL-era car) doesn't help, but matching orange paint they got at Home Depot with the high-quality stuff the William Rast logo is in looks so sloppy. I'd recommend an all-white car with the logo, design on the top of the sidepod, and numbers in the same shiny orange the logo is currently in, because currently, it looks poorly done.
Edited by lewisthegreat2, 16 April 2011 - 08:11 PM.

#26
Posted 17 April 2011 - 02:30 AM
(It bothers me because the William Rast cars are always so pretty, and this one isn't

#28
Posted 17 April 2011 - 04:46 PM

#30
Posted 17 April 2011 - 07:47 PM
lewisthegreat2, on 17 April 2011 - 04:46 PM, said:
Now I'm going to do that just to annoy you!
Uhh, I feel dirty just posting in this thread, better get out of here before someone sees me.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













