One engine rule!!

[HSOF 0]

think the new rule, one engine do more damage than good??

Offcourse it probebly gonna reduce the cost's, but it destroy's the racing!!

The rule was intruduced for two things

1 cut the costs

2 to even out the results(catch Ferrari)

But Buttons penalty clearly robbed us what had been a real exaiting race between MS and Button. (and Kimi before the carfailure)

It's a big shame!!!

And it's unfair, to intruduce a sutch of rule when Ferrari have an so big advanges!!

Imagein if Bar or another team had been challanges Ferrari for the championship this year!!

Ferrari had simply won couse of this

[rodders47 2]

IMO I feel it will be GOOD for the sport, same as the proposed TYRE rule, I really does make sence if you relate F1 to what us mere mortals drive!!!

I know thats an old cliche but hell anyone ( well maybe not that simple but you know what I mean) can make an engine last for maybe 300 kms, but to get the same performance, or close to the same, with RELIABILITY has to be good for the sport and I predict that Ferrari will still be on top :-(

REASON : they seem to do their HOMEWORK better then the rest !!!

[HSOF 0]

Your opinion, Thanks!!

[nichosnz 0]

It certainly looks that way.

Is Ferrari the most powerful engine. No.

Is it the most drivable. No.

Does it have the best balance between the two. No doubt.

Is it the most reliable. No question.

Looks to me like they have done the best homework, as is the recent norm.

[Taku 0]

this new rule only strengthens the status quo. ie given a set of rules the best team performs the best. the other teams have only themselves to blame.

[nojvnof1 0]

bring back the 1000bhp turbos, that'll test this rule!! But in all seriousness, no, I prefer they get rid of the rule.