Ash 0 Report post Posted June 30, 2005 rubbish <{POST_SNAPBACK}> As I said before: "When reasoning fails to prevail ..." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nojvnof1 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2005 "some 6 teams appealed against a very reasonable decision recently." you can't compare that with the Monza tyre saga in 2003 or the McLaren 3rd brake in 1998. Besides, the teams have every right to appeal, it's not their fault that MICHELIN screwed up and brought the wrong tyre. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taku 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2005 yeah, looking for something to appeal later on in the year if they are still behind! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taku 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2005 yes completely inaccurate baseless rumours published to get some page clicks. they did this with the BMW - sauber announcement, fortunately for them they were right that time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> dude, grandprix.com are as as reputable as they get imo. sure they were way off teh mark on this one but they have good sources. that was posted during the council meeting and you can tell just from the site layout that they don't indulge in click-chasing. they were way off the mark this time but that was likely the prevailing view at the time of the hearing untill common sense prevailed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nojvnof1 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2005 Taku, isn't what grandprix.com what Crompton uses for his info pre-race, when he gloats on how great Mark is and how he just got an email from him etc. I think we in Aus better be prepared for some wrong info then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taku 0 Report post Posted July 2, 2005 and you bet he'll be brushing off the wrong info with "i just can't put words together at this hour billy" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cavallino 2 Report post Posted July 4, 2005 Taku, isn't what grandprix.com what Crompton uses for his info pre-race, when he gloats on how great Mark is and how he just got an email from him etc. I think we in Aus better be prepared for some wrong info thenyou actually listen to them am in ESPN STAR territory for a few days dude, grandprix.com are as as reputable as they get imo. sure they were way off teh mark on this one but they have good sources. that was posted during the council meeting and you can tell just from the site layout that they don't indulge in click-chasing. I don't care how reputable they are, they have been as bad as anyone in the english media post indy, look at the things i quoted. Even BBC was fairly biased. reputable - you bet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nojvnof1 0 Report post Posted July 5, 2005 "you actually listen to them" nah not really. I can only hear so much about how great Webber is and how Crompton has all these contacts and emails. I just sit there waiting to see if they mention any news on JV or discuss his efforts in quali. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Senna 0 Report post Posted July 5, 2005 "you actually listen to them" nah not really. I can only hear so much about how great Webber is and how Crompton has all these contacts and emails. I just sit there waiting to see if they mention any news on JV or discuss his efforts in quali. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What evidence does this Crompton chap have! Webber has accomplished very little in F1 so the guy can Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nojvnof1 0 Report post Posted July 6, 2005 sadly, the discussion is long, repetitive and full of praise for Mark. It's more patriotism than hard evidence explaining Mark's results really. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
