Jump to content



- - - - -

K E R S + No Alternator = ????


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 HandyNZL

HandyNZL

    F1 Ace

  • Pit Crew
  • 5,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tron, NZL

Posted 19 November 2012 - 08:26 AM

So Marky Mark DNF's because his alternator packs up and thus his battery runs flat...flat battery = no spark in the combustion chamber.

But he has a totally regenerative battery pack on board.  It's called KERS.

Why has no smart boffin at any team not considered that fact that you could lose a chunk of weight (the traditional battery and the alternator), and replace it with taking a current draw off the KERS batteries for sparking purposes?

The batteries store more amps than they use for the boost they give (or are allowed to give), and every lap the KERS batteries are recharged by those big black spinning rubber alternators, so they would never go flat being used as the source for the spark.

And, it's not a performance enhancement...no extra HP is being made, no wings or ducts opened.  Just keeping the engine running.

I just sit here thinking, "dudes! You're missing the point of KERS!!"

Posted Image


#2 Rainmaster

Rainmaster

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 7,466 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Ning Nang Nong

Posted 19 November 2012 - 10:03 AM

No idea, to be honest. Although I refuse to believe you're smarter than Adrian Newey :P Maybe something in the regulations somewhere?
Never stay up on the barren heights of cleverness, but come down into the green valleys of silliness ~ Ludwig Wittgenstein

#3 freaky2

freaky2

    Elemental de Rayo

  • Senior Members
  • 2,292 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Sunny Spain

Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:37 AM

Well, even if the regulations are dumber than Craig that's still a good observation.
Posted Image

#4 Rainmaster

Rainmaster

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 7,466 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Ning Nang Nong

Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:45 AM

Dumber than Craig? Come on they're bad but..

Actually, on the alternator issue it was funny to hear Newey saying how it's absolutely a Renault problem, they've had the alternator on the engine since 2005 and it's been failing since 2005. I'm sure they'll appreciate that!
Never stay up on the barren heights of cleverness, but come down into the green valleys of silliness ~ Ludwig Wittgenstein

#5 freaky2

freaky2

    Elemental de Rayo

  • Senior Members
  • 2,292 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Sunny Spain

Posted 19 November 2012 - 01:48 PM

Argh, horrible wording >.< Sorry!

Even if they blame Renault, RBR work together with them. They could have complained and the issue could have been fixed. And how come we only hear from RBR about it? There are other cars with the same engine :S
Posted Image

#6 Rainmaster

Rainmaster

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 7,466 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Ning Nang Nong

Posted 19 November 2012 - 01:55 PM

Haha!

Well, as I think James mentioned, apparently the other Renault teams decided to use a new, modified alternator whereas Red Bull stuck with an older one (similar to the one that failed on Red Bull's car in Valencia, strangely). But in Brazil they will have the same one as Lotus, Caterham, etc had in this race, but I guess they'll still have everything crossed on the pitwall.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...rmula1/20389287

Edited by Rainmaster, 19 November 2012 - 01:55 PM.

Never stay up on the barren heights of cleverness, but come down into the green valleys of silliness ~ Ludwig Wittgenstein

#7 Jean-Pierre

Jean-Pierre

    Rookie Driver

  • Members
  • 132 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:MontrĂ©al
  • Interests:Peace, love, and racing!

Posted 19 November 2012 - 03:09 PM

The problem Red Bull has now is that they were using 2011 alternators after discovering that the 2012 were faulty, but there are no more 2011 alternators left, so they have now to use the 2012, and it is a 2012 which failed Mark this week-end. They must be very worried about the last race, where they will have to use the 2012 model.
The driver is more important than the car.

#8 Peeweev

Peeweev

    Rookie Driver

  • Junior Members
  • 56 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 19 November 2012 - 05:53 PM

Its an interesting idea but there must be something to stop it happening; maybe the way the kers pack is regulated for discharge - 6.6 seconds.

Also it does make the final race a lil more exciting with vettle on a timebomb!

#9 F1 FANatic

F1 FANatic

    Back Seat Driver

  • Members
  • 1,426 posts
  • Location:Floating Through Space

Posted 20 November 2012 - 06:59 PM

Well, the regular car systems work on a 12v charge, like every other car in the world really. The KERS runs around ~600v. The KERS still uses a very low amperage but the two systems are independent of one another.

Same reason you need a battery in a Prius or any other hybrid
Posted Image
Jacky Ickx at La Source during practice for the 1970 Grand Prix of Belgium

Posted Image
The Masters have returned.
"People were being killed left, right and center back then," [Phil Hill] says. "I became hyper-sensitive to the danger, and wasn't sure that I wasn't going to kill myself. As a result, racing brought out the worst in me. Without it, I don't know what kind of person I might have become. But I'm not sure I liked the person I did become, because I was selfish, irritable and defensive."

#10 HandyNZL

HandyNZL

    F1 Ace

  • Pit Crew
  • 5,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tron, NZL

Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:36 PM

View PostF1 FANatic, on 20 November 2012 - 06:59 PM, said:

Well, the regular car systems work on a 12v charge, like every other car in the world really. The KERS runs around ~600v. The KERS still uses a very low amperage but the two systems are independent of one another.

Same reason you need a battery in a Prius or any other hybrid

Good point, however there are ways and means of converting high voltages to low voltages.

It's not an unsolvable equation in other words.

Posted Image





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This website is unofficial and is not associated in any way with the Formula One group of companies. F1, FORMULA ONE, FORMULA 1, FIA FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, GRAND PRIX and related marks are trade marks of Formula One Licensing B.V.