Jump to content



- - - - -

New Developments At Hockenheim


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Jez

Jez

    F1 Champignon

  • Senior Members
  • 1,773 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Terra is my nation

Posted 08 July 2008 - 11:27 PM

Posted Image
One after another, McLaren's shark fin
On McLaren MP4-23 At HockenheimIt just appears like every other week a team introduces its own shark fin engine cover, named by McLaren as a "top body dorsal fin". What's in a name. Needless to say, the item works similar as with Red Bull and its copycats, helping to maintain the car's stability while cornering. The rear cut-out around the rear wing's leading edge is at the same time preventing that the rear wing's efficiency would decrease when the car is in considerable yaw.
It's now a waiting game to see when Ferrari of BMW will come up with it, but don't be surprised if that's somewhere during this Hockenheim test too.





Posted Image
Williams introduce extended sidepod panel
On Williams FW30 At GP FranceJust as most other teams, Williams have now also developed a downward extension to the sidepod panel. The approach differs from what is already on competing cars as the lower end does not directly connect to the barge board. Instead, the floor was extended to create a base for a connection point. On the upper side, Williams have also taken the chance to develop their sidepod panel further and enlarged it towards the front wheels.
All in all a very elegant solution to condition the turbulent airflow behind the front wheels.



Posted Image
Venting rear wheel fairings at Toyota
On Toyota TF108 At GP FranceWheel fairings have become fairly normal by now, and most teams have identical designs. At the rear, every team used a fixed shield with a central opening, both allowing the mechanics to fit the tyres and to provide an exhaust for brake air (and dust).
Toyota have now given a new twist to it as they designed a venting shield. Instead of a closed carbon disc, the element consists of small, identical aerofoils that allow hot air to escape from the wheel. More specifically at the upper half of the wheel, the rotational speed and the airspeed around the wheel will cause brake air to be drawn away, effectively increasing the cooling capacity.
A similar shape can often be recognised in the arms of road car wheels, although these mostly direct air into the wheel, rather than out of it.



Posted Image
Force India introduce new sidepod design
On Force India F1 VJM-01 At GP Great BritainForce India have finally got rid of the huge chimneys that the car is featuring since the inauguration of the team. The team now developed a new sidepod cover that effectively closes the chimneys and adds a considerable amount of shark gills to provide enough cooling for the engine.
The upper image is the new design as seen at the British GP, while below is the version used at the French GP. The image clearly shows how the winglet's outer endplate is now a continuation of the closed chimney panel, similar to Ferrari. Below the winglet is now more open space to pull more air towards the centre of the car, helping downforce at the rear end. At the same time, the sidepod panel has been redesigned with a large slot, now also more similar to Ferrari, despite the panel's tighter integration with the sidepod.
In spite of these aerodynamic improvements, the team decided now to change the frontal shape of the sidepod. While an undercut would benefit the car's performance, such redesign would also involve changing the side impact crash structures and require a new crash test.
Apart from the sidepod improvements, the team also introduced a new shark fin engine cover.


I know most of us just want the cars back to how they were in the old days, and I'm sure the racing would be better as a result, but seperate to that, I like watching each team find ways to improve aero as above. I for one actually thing all the winglets look kinda rad. I'm a bit of a kid I know. It's just, the cars from decades back look kind of boring to me.

#2 aussief1

aussief1

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 3,909 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia

Posted 09 July 2008 - 12:20 AM

View PostJez, on Jul 9 2008, 09:27 AM, said:

I know most of us just want the cars back to how they were in the old days, and I'm sure the racing would be better as a result, but seperate to that, I like watching each team find ways to improve aero as above. I for one actually thing all the winglets look kinda rad. I'm a bit of a kid I know. It's just, the cars from decades back look kind of boring to me.

I'm with you Jez I too like the new age aero designs. But I do also like the old simplicity designs of the past. I'm just easy to please :D

Edited by aussief1, 09 July 2008 - 12:21 AM.

Posted Image
"Giancarlo, you are still two seconds a lap slower than Fernando, this cannot be possible you have the same fuel load, I know you have some understeer but you cannot be two seconds slower, COME ON"!!!! - Alan Permane, Fisichella�s race engineer, 2006 Australian Grand Prix
"We're lucky we don't build aeroplanes" - Mark Webber on Red Bulls reliability issues at the Australian Grand Prix 2008.
Nathan is: .............. ??

#3 HandyNZL

HandyNZL

    F1 Ace

  • Pit Crew
  • 5,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tron, NZL

Posted 09 July 2008 - 09:37 PM

When was the last time an 'ocker was easily pleased though Nate?

I like the aero too...and one day they'll come up with a wing that doesn't disturb the air.  It's. All. A. Matter. Of. Time.

:P

Posted Image


#4 aussief1

aussief1

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 3,909 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia

Posted 09 July 2008 - 09:43 PM

View PostHandyNZL, on Jul 10 2008, 07:37 AM, said:

When was the last time an 'ocker was easily pleased though Nate?

:lol:
Posted Image
"Giancarlo, you are still two seconds a lap slower than Fernando, this cannot be possible you have the same fuel load, I know you have some understeer but you cannot be two seconds slower, COME ON"!!!! - Alan Permane, Fisichella�s race engineer, 2006 Australian Grand Prix
"We're lucky we don't build aeroplanes" - Mark Webber on Red Bulls reliability issues at the Australian Grand Prix 2008.
Nathan is: .............. ??

#5 DOF_power

DOF_power

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 2,157 posts

Posted 10 July 2008 - 06:47 AM

What is needed is something like this:

Posted Image


And active suspensions to control the ride height (amongst others).

Quote

You start with fuel, you do one stop and it's pretty much a train all the way
Lewis Hamilton


#6 maure

maure

    Fig tree

  • Senior Members
  • 3,955 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 July 2008 - 06:59 AM

View PostJez, on Jul 8 2008, 11:27 PM, said:

I know most of us just want the cars back to how they were in the old days, and I'm sure the racing would be better as a result, but seperate to that, I like watching each team find ways to improve aero as above. I for one actually thing all the winglets look kinda rad. I'm a bit of a kid I know. It's just, the cars from decades back look kind of boring to me.

You are not alone. I like the aero oddities too.
I walk.

#7 duest

duest

    Rookie Driver

  • Members
  • 181 posts
  • Location:Adelaide, Australia

Posted 10 July 2008 - 12:53 PM

I too like all the aero bits and bobs on the car. There's an elegance of sorts to the aero complexity.

I wonder if the Toyota rear wheel fairings will be deemed a moveable aero device. I don't know about the wording of the regulation, but the fairings move and they are designed to alter the air flow...

#8 Jez

Jez

    F1 Champignon

  • Senior Members
  • 1,773 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Terra is my nation

Posted 10 July 2008 - 01:04 PM

View Postduest, on Jul 10 2008, 10:53 PM, said:

I too like all the aero bits and bobs on the car. There's an elegance of sorts to the aero complexity.

I wonder if the Toyota rear wheel fairings will be deemed a moveable aero device. I don't know about the wording of the regulation, but the fairings move and they are designed to alter the air flow...

I guess if it doesn't flex, they'll let em keep it.

#9 HandyNZL

HandyNZL

    F1 Ace

  • Pit Crew
  • 5,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tron, NZL

Posted 10 July 2008 - 08:24 PM

View PostDOF_Renault_BMW, on Jul 10 2008, 06:47 PM, said:

What is needed is something like this:

Posted Image


And active suspensions to control the ride height (amongst others).

I see a small problem with the design of the drive train on this particular car :P

Posted Image


#10 HandyNZL

HandyNZL

    F1 Ace

  • Pit Crew
  • 5,031 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tron, NZL

Posted 10 July 2008 - 08:26 PM

View PostJez, on Jul 11 2008, 01:04 AM, said:

I guess if it doesn't flex, they'll let em keep it.

As far as I'm aware the term is "moveable" which is why all the hub-fairings don't move on the cars at the moment.  Does the Toyota one rotate? Has this been confirmed?

If it's integral to the wheel - i.e. the spokes - then it would be legal, but if it is an additional item it would be illegal.

Posted Image


#11 aussief1

aussief1

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 3,909 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia

Posted 10 July 2008 - 09:50 PM

View PostHandyNZL, on Jul 11 2008, 06:26 AM, said:

As far as I'm aware the term is "moveable" which is why all the hub-fairings don't move on the cars at the moment.  Does the Toyota one rotate? Has this been confirmed?

If it's integral to the wheel - i.e. the spokes - then it would be legal, but if it is an additional item it would be illegal.

The venting wheel fairings on the TF108 are fixed to the hub as far as I'm aware.
Posted Image
"Giancarlo, you are still two seconds a lap slower than Fernando, this cannot be possible you have the same fuel load, I know you have some understeer but you cannot be two seconds slower, COME ON"!!!! - Alan Permane, Fisichella�s race engineer, 2006 Australian Grand Prix
"We're lucky we don't build aeroplanes" - Mark Webber on Red Bulls reliability issues at the Australian Grand Prix 2008.
Nathan is: .............. ??




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This website is unofficial and is not associated in any way with the Formula One group of companies. F1, FORMULA ONE, FORMULA 1, FIA FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, GRAND PRIX and related marks are trade marks of Formula One Licensing B.V.