Clicky

Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

rodders47

Ain't It Funny

Recommended Posts

But isnt that a good thing, cos it shows they are real people just like the rest of us? Divorces, teenagers smoking drugs, happens in a lot of families! I like the royal family mainly because it is a symbol of britishness, having a king/queen with knights and royal carriages etc and a big palace, its part of our heritage. Having said that I can see why australia wouldnt care if the royal family disintegrated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But isnt that a good thing, cos it shows they are real people just like the rest of us? Divorces, teenagers smoking drugs, happens in a lot of families! I like the royal family mainly because it is a symbol of britishness, having a king/queen with knights and royal carriages etc and a big palace, its part of our heritage. Having said that I can see why australia wouldnt care if the royal family disintegrated!

I watch this british documentary 2 years ago about the true royal family. Apparent several hundred years ago a person who became king was actually illigitement and shouldnt have been king. This documentary followed the true line of the Royal Family until they found who should be king. Appently the real king of England has lived in Australia for 45 years but was born in England. It was the funniest thing ive ever seen imagining this guy as king of England. He had a rather large beer gut and loved going to the pub with his mates to watch the crciket and rugby. Remember this was a English documentary and they flew all the way to Australia to meet this guy. You should have seen his face when they host of the show said that he is the true King of England.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends how far back they went. The lineage has changed often in the past due to wars, untimely deaths and so on. tudors, stuarts, Plantagenets and Saxe-Coburgs.

I'm happy with the current lot, especially Prince Philip; he's pure entertainment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends how far back they went. The lineage has changed often in the past due to wars, untimely deaths and so on. tudors, stuarts, Plantagenets and Saxe-Coburgs.

I'm happy with the current lot, especially Prince Philip; he's pure entertainment.

It was back in the 17th Century i think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That makes sense. They just couldn't keep it in their trousers.... :naughty:

Wheeeeee! My 1000th post! :yahoo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Home and Away. And Jason Donovan. And Barry Humphries. And Paul Hogan. And Neighbours. And Merv Hughes. Etc... ;)

Indeed, to name but a few

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no problem being linked to England. I just dont like the Royal Family. Something i have always wondered in a hyperthetical situation, if America invaded New Zealand and we defended New Zealand (as we would) what would England do, techniqually we are still part of the British Empire, there are only 3 opinions.

1. England help Australia

2. England stays neutral (which would mean that they ignore our defence treaty)

3. Join America in the invasion

Dont take this personally Americans, i know you have no wish to invade New Zealand (who would) but im just curious where English loyalities are.

That might not be a hypothetical situation for much longer if Dubya gets his way!

First France, then New Zealand and then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good point. I hadn't thought of that but you're no doubt right as so often. (People were already biased towards breast cancer over prostate cancer imo but this is presumably what gave them the idea at this time in Aus)

It can

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That might not be a hypothetical situation for much longer if Dubya gets his way!

First France, then New Zealand and then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well if they beat us at rugby on Saturday they won't be getting any support from me.

Indeed. I suspect that, if they did beat us on the rugby field they will shortly be meeting us on the battlefield. No doubt the populous will be demanding military action and with good reason.

You're right that NZ's foreign policy is almost as selfish as the French one too.

Something Dubya will not have failed to notice. I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Indeed. I suspect that, if they did beat us on the rugby field they will shortly be meeting us on the battlefield. No doubt the populous will be demanding military action and with good reason.

Something Dubya will not have failed to notice. I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quite right. Do the NZ army do the Ha'ka before each battle? If so a cunning battleplan suggests itself.... Go Dubya!

Jeb is confident that he, Dubya and Arnie (and the US army) will triumph. Here he announces his intentions to the waiting media.

jeb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes! If past experience is any guide I suspect Jeb, Arnie and Dubya will be right behind their men. In fact as far behind as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes! If past experience is any guide I suspect Jeb, Arnie and Dubya will be right behind their men. In fact as far behind as possible.

God you guys crack me up :D:D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quite right. Do the NZ army do the Ha'ka before each battle? If so a cunning battleplan suggests itself.... Go Dubya!

New Zealand have a army of about 500 men. New Zealands entire defence requires Australia's assistance and they know that we would help them as much as we can. We (Australia) have a intense loyalty to New Zealand as we faught together in both world wars. Japanese battle plans for WW2 were released afew years ago and they were planning to invade New Zealand after they had taken Indonesia. Then they would have had Australia's major cities sorrounded and the invasion of Australia would have been much easier. These days New Zealand doesnt really have a army to speak of these days because they arnt really threatened by any other country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and he was australian to boot. One down two to go I say!
here we go again. JV was right, Brits think F1 is British and until the series is dominated by Brits the whinging will continue (the latter was my saying, not JV's) ;)
There are plenty of people in England who i do like. I dont get all upset and emotional when you badmouth Webber and the Australian Scoocer Team.

It's football! What's with all the Aust v GB thing on here anyways? What is going to happen if we get grouped with England in Germany, it'll be havoc central!

Shaun, I would like you to address my comments.
I really have no comment to make as it really seems to rile you and a couple of others up more than myself. There was a big message and donations for Breast Cancer Research before Kylie got it Senna.
Good point. I hadn't thought of that but you're no doubt right as so often.

here's a tissue to clean that brown bit off your nose. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
New Zealand have a army of about 500 men. New Zealands entire defence requires Australia's assistance and they know that we would help them as much as we can. We (Australia) have a intense loyalty to New Zealand as we faught together in both world wars. Japanese battle plans for WW2 were released afew years ago and they were planning to invade New Zealand after they had taken Indonesia. Then they would have had Australia's major cities sorrounded and the invasion of Australia would have been much easier. These days New Zealand doesnt really have a army to speak of these days because they arnt really threatened by any other country.

:lol: They

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...