Jem of the Shire 0 Report post Posted September 29, 2005 He has this unique position where he's higher up but with his head slightly down. But I always remember Irvine was very high up in his ferrari Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bajo39 0 Report post Posted September 29, 2005 He has this unique position where he's higher up but with his head slightly down. But I always remember Irvine was very high up in his ferrari How about Wilson in his Minardi? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Senna 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 How about Wilson in his Minardi? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Senna 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 I quite like what narain fan said. Senna, he's comparing Button to a race horse and Sato to a donkey. It's a no brainer that the horse is going to win out of the two, so why overhype his achivements when he's really beating one of so little talent. Ah, thank-you for your explanation, we don Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sdoik 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 If your saying that Jenson Button, being 4th or 5th best driver in the competition according to some on this board, is impressive by annihilated the 16th+ (and thats being nice) best driver in the field then you need to get your head out of the clouds. I don't think Jenson is Sh#t, but your perception of being impressed by his annihlation of Sato is When he has done the same against a barrichello i'll be be impressed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bajo39 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 If your saying that Jenson Button, being 4th or 5th best driver in the competition according to some on this board It is more persuasive to quote me than 'some on this board'... Anyway, Senna is correct: both a horse (Jenson) and a donkey (Sato) have a certain measurable pace (see my rankings in separate thread) and if the horse beats the donkey by more than expected, then the horse has outperformed expectations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sdoik 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 It is more persuasive to quote me than 'some on this board'... Perhaps, but i'm sure your not the only one who possesses that view, which is why I typed it the way I did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jem of the Shire 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 Again - the point is, people like koolmonkey cannot say the BAR is a race-winning car, or Button is slow etc when theres no proof - the only other BAR driver is always far behind Button. So as far as we know, Button is getting the maximum out of the car every race Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sato 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 As far as we know, he is a second a lap slower then Mark Webber.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jenson_Rules 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 Who didnt have graining and over/understeer! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wez 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 Sure? I won Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sato 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 That is true. This only proves Montoya is a better driver then thought, since he won races with that gut of his in the Williams! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bajo39 0 Report post Posted September 30, 2005 That is true. This only proves Montoya is a better driver then thought, since he won races with that gut of his in the Williams! Now I understand how you can support Sato Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
