Jump to content



- - - - -

Mclaren's New Engine Cover


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#31 Jean Todt

Jean Todt

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 7,919 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land of cars....

Posted 25 July 2008 - 11:07 PM

View PostJez, on Jul 25 2008, 04:54 PM, said:

Posted Image

Posted Image

The circle is complete. I think every team has tested the shark fin now, unless I've left someone out?
Hmm....Super Aguri?

#32 HandyNZL

HandyNZL

    F1 Ace

  • Pit Crew
  • 5,020 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tron, NZL

Posted 26 July 2008 - 12:02 AM

Hondas bunny rabbit ears have grown vertical planes too....going for extended dumbo mileage like a 747-400 :P

Posted Image


#33 duest

duest

    Rookie Driver

  • Members
  • 181 posts
  • Location:Adelaide, Australia

Posted 26 July 2008 - 05:42 AM

View PostMeanioni, on Jul 26 2008, 03:07 AM, said:

I hope they ban them - an F1 car should be a thing of beauty...
Who made you the judge of what constitutes beautiful? I think these new engine covers look fine.

#34 Grabthaw the Hammerslayer

Grabthaw the Hammerslayer

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 3,364 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The garden of England

Posted 26 July 2008 - 05:47 AM

View Postduest, on Jul 26 2008, 06:42 AM, said:

Who made you the judge of what constitutes beautiful?

Eh? What a dumb question. I am not speaking on behalf of humanity - in my personal opinion I think they look ugly.

View Postduest, on Jul 26 2008, 06:42 AM, said:

I think these new engine covers look fine.

Good for you.

   The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch

   Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, where the hell is the ceiling?

   I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all nervous and give the wrong answers.

  


#35 DOF_power

DOF_power

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 2,157 posts

Posted 26 July 2008 - 11:56 AM

Nope, a Grand Prix car should be a thing of form-follows-function/ efficiency. Beauty if there is to be, is but a perk an accident.
Beauty got lost when they banned the active ride cars.

Quote

You start with fuel, you do one stop and it's pretty much a train all the way
Lewis Hamilton


#36 aussief1

aussief1

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 3,909 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia

Posted 06 August 2008 - 06:18 AM

McLaren look like they might not be following the trend of racing the "Shark Fin", aka "Anvil" engine cover.

Quote

The team’s CEO Martin Whitmarsh said: “Its intended aim was to improve the car’s sensitivity during yaw, but we found that some of the advantage it brought to that area was being offset elsewhere.

“As you can clearly see, it is a large structure and one that is particularly sensitive to crosswinds.

“We felt that our car already delivers sufficiently in yaw and that continuing to experiment with the dorsal fin might not bring us the sufficient performance benefit we’d require to make it worthwhile.”

Posted Image
"Giancarlo, you are still two seconds a lap slower than Fernando, this cannot be possible you have the same fuel load, I know you have some understeer but you cannot be two seconds slower, COME ON"!!!! - Alan Permane, Fisichella�s race engineer, 2006 Australian Grand Prix
"We're lucky we don't build aeroplanes" - Mark Webber on Red Bulls reliability issues at the Australian Grand Prix 2008.
Nathan is: .............. ??




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This website is unofficial and is not associated in any way with the Formula One group of companies. F1, FORMULA ONE, FORMULA 1, FIA FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, GRAND PRIX and related marks are trade marks of Formula One Licensing B.V.