Jez, on Jul 25 2008, 04:54 PM, said:
Mclaren's New Engine Cover
Started by
DOF_power
, Jul 08 2008 12:11 PM
35 replies to this topic
#31
Posted 25 July 2008 - 11:07 PM
#34
Posted 26 July 2008 - 05:47 AM
duest, on Jul 26 2008, 06:42 AM, said:
Who made you the judge of what constitutes beautiful?
Eh? What a dumb question. I am not speaking on behalf of humanity - in my personal opinion I think they look ugly.
duest, on Jul 26 2008, 06:42 AM, said:
I think these new engine covers look fine.
Good for you.
The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, where the hell is the ceiling?
I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all nervous and give the wrong answers.
#35
Posted 26 July 2008 - 11:56 AM
Nope, a Grand Prix car should be a thing of form-follows-function/ efficiency. Beauty if there is to be, is but a perk an accident.
Beauty got lost when they banned the active ride cars.
Beauty got lost when they banned the active ride cars.
Quote
You start with fuel, you do one stop and it's pretty much a train all the way
Lewis Hamilton
Lewis Hamilton
#36
Posted 06 August 2008 - 06:18 AM
McLaren look like they might not be following the trend of racing the "Shark Fin", aka "Anvil" engine cover.
Quote
The team’s CEO Martin Whitmarsh said: “Its intended aim was to improve the car’s sensitivity during yaw, but we found that some of the advantage it brought to that area was being offset elsewhere.
“As you can clearly see, it is a large structure and one that is particularly sensitive to crosswinds.
“We felt that our car already delivers sufficiently in yaw and that continuing to experiment with the dorsal fin might not bring us the sufficient performance benefit we’d require to make it worthwhile.”
“As you can clearly see, it is a large structure and one that is particularly sensitive to crosswinds.
“We felt that our car already delivers sufficiently in yaw and that continuing to experiment with the dorsal fin might not bring us the sufficient performance benefit we’d require to make it worthwhile.”

"Giancarlo, you are still two seconds a lap slower than Fernando, this cannot be possible you have the same fuel load, I know you have some understeer but you cannot be two seconds slower, COME ON"!!!! - Alan Permane, Fisichella�s race engineer, 2006 Australian Grand Prix
"We're lucky we don't build aeroplanes" - Mark Webber on Red Bulls reliability issues at the Australian Grand Prix 2008.
Nathan is: .............. ??
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














