Clicky

Jump to content

BradSpeedMan

Pit Crew
  • Content Count

    11,059
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

BradSpeedMan last won the day on July 31 2009

BradSpeedMan had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About BradSpeedMan

  • Rank
    F1 Ace
  • Birthday 05/18/1973

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,810 profile views
  1. Here's another issue with that budget cap Sakae http://gptoday.com/full_story/view/834159/Several_F1_teams_at_risk_of_missing_last_few_races__Horner/ Horner is rubbing it in. I don't blame him. He wants to develop more
  2. It was a really great decision to recall KMag. Mick is still learning, but he is steadily improving. I've read some good things about him. He definately belongs in top-tier racing
  3. Amazing is'nt it. I find it hard to believe they did NOT bring some sort of upgrade parts
  4. Lol Yes. Teams won't manage to compete if they reach the ceiling, The answer is probably a spec series where parts are homologated while teams have free reign on aero and engine. and TESTING Pls
  5. I agree with your sentiment, but what do you mean with bolded part. How can it not be policed? I suspect teams must have an accurate logbook, which needs to be presented and reviewed. The no-testing bs can cause real harm to the drivers in the longer term, I've read. The porpoising issue goes way beyond the F1 rulebook, it's a threat to the driver's health conditions.. Surely on that basis alone, I'm just using a specific example, teams should be allowed to sort this out with their respected Visual Identities . Performance-wise, allow teams test to level the playing field, in terms of competition. The concern is, how do you prevent teams who just forges ahead, with unlimited budget...
  6. Can you believe this... https://twitter.com/tgruener/status/1527326166926774272/photo/1
  7. How is this for some news... The guy (Stroll) can't even give proper feedback, from what I read.... https://thejudge13.com/2022/05/13/ferrari-copy-real-aston-martin-car-breaks-cover-but-is-for-lance-stroll-only/
  8. He did not SEE him. Gasly did not see Lando. All in the blind spot. It was not Mick's corner because Seb was ahead in the corner. Mick could not possibly overtake from there. Anyway, the stewards declared it a racing incident, Let's leave it at that.
  9. Schumacher should'nt have been in the position that he created, Vettel had the racing line turning in
  10. Hey, It was just a racing accident. Vettel had no idea he was there. I feel for them both
  11. RBR won, on merit. They had the faster package whole weekend Ferrari did not lose the race, they were slower and lead driver made a terrible mistake. If that was Seb!
×
×
  • Create New...