Jump to content



- - - - -

Pneumatic Valve Technology


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 dribbler

dribbler

    Prostate Senna's fumes

  • Senior Members
  • 7,803 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Behind you, waaaaah!
  • Interests:Boobs, beer and bikes.

Posted 18 March 2011 - 02:03 PM

Was thinking today; surely a pneumatic valves system on an F1 engine removes the need for a mechanically driven camshaft, therefore liberating more power. I know that this is not the only reason it is used; valve springs are notoriously unreliable when having to accept the demands of 18,000rpm.

What are the drawbacks to this technology being used in road car engines? Would a compressor really present too large a packaging issue? Wouldn't the savings in fuel economy off-set this?

Please tell me what I'm missing. Does anyone understand? Hello?
Listening to    MSTRKRFT - Fist of God

Posted Image
Music connects people through the unspoken appreciation of something that sounds right. Something that taps into the deepest corners of your soul, making you feel alive. When someone else gets it too and you know they do, it feels beautiful.

"To be brutal and honest I don't have a thin skin and others who whine over every little thing will not curry favour. I'm just going to try to keep this place fun, as it has been for all of these years." Pumpdoc, 8th Decemeber 2010.

#2 monza gorilla

monza gorilla

    Forum artefact

  • Senior Members
  • 6,649 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:52°23'52.86"N 0°43'28.92"W
  • Interests:Adnams Broadside. Fullers ESB.

Posted 18 March 2011 - 03:30 PM

The current engines still use cams. The pneumatic part of the system just returns the valve to the closed position. Renault did have plans for an electro hydraulic set up without cams, using the onboard hydraulic system but couldn't make it reliable. It does give infinitely variable valve timing though, which is quite exciting. If you could guarantee reliability then I suppose it would be applicable to road cars, but I think for now a spring is more trustworthy than a pressurised system.

Posted Image
Pneumatic system

Posted Image
Electro hydraulic system
Reading: other peoples posts
Listening to: Cracker - Kerosene Hat
Posted Image

Dig that jive, Jack. Put it in your pocket, and don't look back.

#3 dribbler

dribbler

    Prostate Senna's fumes

  • Senior Members
  • 7,803 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Behind you, waaaaah!
  • Interests:Boobs, beer and bikes.

Posted 18 March 2011 - 04:47 PM

Splendid info, thanks Russ.
Listening to    MSTRKRFT - Fist of God

Posted Image
Music connects people through the unspoken appreciation of something that sounds right. Something that taps into the deepest corners of your soul, making you feel alive. When someone else gets it too and you know they do, it feels beautiful.

"To be brutal and honest I don't have a thin skin and others who whine over every little thing will not curry favour. I'm just going to try to keep this place fun, as it has been for all of these years." Pumpdoc, 8th Decemeber 2010.

#4 Quiet One

Quiet One

    The balding avenger

  • Senior Members
  • 10,490 posts
  • Location:Argentina

Posted 18 March 2011 - 05:27 PM

Gentlemen,

Please remember that this is a Formula One forum so stop spamming us with your penis enlargement systems and such.

If you do not have anything useful to contribute then you may join any other forum.
"There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the Universe, and it has a longer shelf life" - Frank Zappa

"Great drivers are the ones who win the races they're not supposed to" - K.Chandhok


"On the rare occasions that I play a racing game I often think ‘you know what this needs? A boss battle or two.’ A Formula One game in which, suddenly, everybody else has a monster truck and their sole desire is to squash you. A street racing game with a tank or two blowing the roads and buildings to bits. A Nascar game with a track that occasionally bends to the right" (Adam Smith - RPS)

#5 HandyNZL

HandyNZL

    F1 Ace

  • Pit Crew
  • 5,028 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Tron, NZL

Posted 19 March 2011 - 07:12 AM

In a nut shell, pneumatics is too bulky, due to the pressure of the system having to be reasonably low (say 110psi or so), but needing to do the same work as a spring able to produce much higher pressure, or a hydraulic system that can easily handle 3000psi.  For a 110psi system do the same work as a 3000psi hydraulic system, then the surface area that the pneumatic system must work on has to be three times as large (3x 110psi = 3300psi), hence things get bigger.

Plus pneumatic systems are notoriously bad for sealing.  Hydraulics can leak, yet still work as most systems are designed to work at only 90%, or even as low as 80% of maximum...a small leak might only drop oil pressures by 5%.  Pneumatics seems, in my experience with them on trucks, trailers, and rail infrastructure equipment I design and work on day in day out, not to have the same work arounds in this regard - think a pin prick in a balloon and trying to keep it inflated.

The best pneumatic system ever used by man thus far would be a triple expansion steam engine.  The system is still pneumatic in nature (using steam gas)...but to get the horsepower, those engines were massive in size.

Pneumatics have their place for quick actuation of levers and what not, but in all instances the size needed for pneumatics is greater than that for hydraulics, hence no good for race cars, and probably not viable on a road car.

Posted Image


#6 dribbler

dribbler

    Prostate Senna's fumes

  • Senior Members
  • 7,803 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Behind you, waaaaah!
  • Interests:Boobs, beer and bikes.

Posted 20 March 2011 - 05:58 PM

View PostQuiet One, on 18 March 2011 - 05:27 PM, said:

Gentlemen,

Please remember that this is a Formula One forum so stop spamming us with your penis enlargement systems and such.

If you do not have anything useful to contribute then you may join any other forum.

You're not interested in abigger penis then? Could off-set the hair loss thing quite nicely....


View PostHandyNZL, on 19 March 2011 - 07:12 AM, said:

In a nut shell, pneumatics is too bulky, due to the pressure of the system having to be reasonably low (say 110psi or so), but needing to do the same work as a spring able to produce much higher pressure, or a hydraulic system that can easily handle 3000psi.  For a 110psi system do the same work as a 3000psi hydraulic system, then the surface area that the pneumatic system must work on has to be three times as large (3x 110psi = 3300psi), hence things get bigger.

Plus pneumatic systems are notoriously bad for sealing.  Hydraulics can leak, yet still work as most systems are designed to work at only 90%, or even as low as 80% of maximum...a small leak might only drop oil pressures by 5%.  Pneumatics seems, in my experience with them on trucks, trailers, and rail infrastructure equipment I design and work on day in day out, not to have the same work arounds in this regard - think a pin prick in a balloon and trying to keep it inflated.

The best pneumatic system ever used by man thus far would be a triple expansion steam engine.  The system is still pneumatic in nature (using steam gas)...but to get the horsepower, those engines were massive in size.

Pneumatics have their place for quick actuation of levers and what not, but in all instances the size needed for pneumatics is greater than that for hydraulics, hence no good for race cars, and probably not viable on a road car.

More splendid info. Thanks, sheep fiddler Craig.
Listening to    MSTRKRFT - Fist of God

Posted Image
Music connects people through the unspoken appreciation of something that sounds right. Something that taps into the deepest corners of your soul, making you feel alive. When someone else gets it too and you know they do, it feels beautiful.

"To be brutal and honest I don't have a thin skin and others who whine over every little thing will not curry favour. I'm just going to try to keep this place fun, as it has been for all of these years." Pumpdoc, 8th Decemeber 2010.

#7 Caesar

Caesar

    Veteran Driver

  • Members
  • 968 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 March 2011 - 07:20 PM

does this penis enlargement systems really works? where do you put the stuff ? can you show it on a cucumber
Posted Image   John Henry Bonham

#8 airmaxindia12

airmaxindia12

    Test Driver

  • New Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 20 April 2012 - 04:15 AM

Pneumatic valve springs gave Renault an advantage with its turbocharged engines, often said to be the most powerful. However, reliability and poor handling of their chassis kept the cars from success until 1989 when Renault provided Williams with its V10 engine to begin a winning streak.

#9 Jean Todt

Jean Todt

    F1 Ace

  • Senior Members
  • 7,919 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land of cars....

Posted 20 April 2012 - 06:25 AM

Well Fiat is using electro-hydraulic variable valve actuation technology on the intake side in their Multiair engines.

And Koenigsegg is one of the few high performance (atm) car manufacturer working on Pneumatic Valve tech for their future cars. Many forum cowboys are already saying it will be impossible for them with the resources they have, but they have proved their critics wrong in the past.

http://performancedr...vetrain-report/

#10 The Shadow

The Shadow

    Rookie Driver

  • Members
  • 278 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Strana Mechty
  • Interests:Engineering, Motorsport, Humour (with a "u" FFS!!), Self-Preservation

Posted 20 April 2012 - 02:14 PM

Simple reason would be cost and reliability.

Cost : If the engines are not designed to rev >11k rpm, A pneumatic system would not really add much performance gain compared to boring old springs. To extract the advantage of a pneumatic systems the engine should be designed to rev higher, which would entail a stiffer block, exotic reciprocating parts, extensive water and oil cooling and significant concessions where emissions are concerned (burning 3 kg of RON 100 per 4-5 km). In short, from a cost standpoint I doubt a consumer would be prepared to shell out much for such an expensive system that requires careful monitoring during its operation. It would be much easier and more practical to just turbocharge the engine (improving efficiency by charging and cooling the air) and getting similar torque figures at lower rpms.

Reliability: I doubt people would want to subject their cars to a shorter servicing cycle due to the extreme pressures put upon the components of the engine. If anything, the public today would rather prefer longer periods in between services. We compare a pneumatic system that contains a pressure vessel, lines, compressor, sensors, electronic control unit, actuators to the alternative - springs. Less things to go wrong there.
Refer above for quotes




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This website is unofficial and is not associated in any way with the Formula One group of companies. F1, FORMULA ONE, FORMULA 1, FIA FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, GRAND PRIX and related marks are trade marks of Formula One Licensing B.V.