Paprika 0 Report post Posted April 17, 2009 Read up... http://paddocktalk.com/news/html/modules.p...c=8&catid=0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Piotr 0 Report post Posted April 18, 2009 Read up...http://paddocktalk.com/news/html/modules.p...c=8&catid=0 "I want to be absolutely clear, on the record, that we have never said and we do not believe that for one minute either the Ferrari cars, or Renault cars, or anyone else's cars, for the last eight years have been illegal," said Parr. You must be getting your clues from CNN or Reuters... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
james 0 Report post Posted April 18, 2009 If it was illegal it would be breaking a rule, not exploiting a loophole. Perfectly legal and as far as I'm concerned as much a part of motor racing as anything else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dribbler 6 Report post Posted April 18, 2009 Kiwi's nickname for sheep is 'loops'. They are constantly exploiting loopholes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mikathegreat2 2 Report post Posted April 18, 2009 For years??? Shut up!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kay 0 Report post Posted April 18, 2009 The whole point was the basis of Ferrari's argument against the diffuser meant they were effectively calling their own previous cars illegal too. It's part of Ferraris shoot-foot policy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rainmaster 7 Report post Posted April 19, 2009 Ferrari need a reshuffle, perhaps starting with the legal department. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SchumiDeFcuk 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2009 No doubt Ferrari is not a sporting team throughout ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
