Clicky

Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Wez

The English Premier League

Recommended Posts

when was the last time liverpool actually scored a goal???

:lol:

Against Sheffield 3 games ago - we scored 4, believe it or not. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

Against Sheffield 3 games ago - we scored 4, believe it or not. :D

At this moment in time, Liverpool couldn't score in a cheap Vietnamese whore house!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Until united have 18 league titles and 5 european cups to their name (and until they win with football, not diving portugese men) I think the last laugh is on us :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is that Liverpool or you, Wez?? :lol:

I scored a couple of cracking goals last night at football & have packs of women chasing after me (some for the wrong reasons I will admit)...

Anyway, Im definitely talking about Liverpool!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool have won more trophies than United ever will :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Until united have 18 league titles and 5 european cups to their name (and until they win with football, not diving portugese men) I think the last laugh is on us :D

Until Liverpool have won the treble, the last laugh is on Man Utd!!

Anyway Nottingham Forest won the European Cup once and they're certainly not laughing about anything right now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Until Liverpool have won the treble, the last laugh is on Man Utd!!

Anyway Nottingham Forest won the European Cup once and they're certainly not laughing about anything right now

Nottingham Forest have actually won the European Cup twice... And yet they are struggling away in the lower English league's nowadays and definately not laughing...

History is one thing, what really counts is the present!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I scored a couple of cracking goals last night at football & have packs of women chasing after me (some for the wrong reasons I will admit)...

Anyway, Im definitely talking about Liverpool!

:lol:

You socred in the showers, you mean!! It's ok, Ben is open about these sort of things, so you can be too! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Until Liverpool have won the treble, the last laugh is on Man Utd!!

Anyway Nottingham Forest won the European Cup once and they're certainly not laughing about anything right now

Doing doubles or trebles is all very good and a great achievement for the team involved, but it isn't the most important thing, besides we have done a treble! :D

Nottingham Forest have actually won the European Cup twice... And yet they are struggling away in the lower English league's nowadays and definately not laughing...

History is one thing, what really counts is the present!

Indeed, they won back to back european cups and not too many teams have done that.

Yep, history is important, but the present is the bread and butter!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:lol:

You socred in the showers, you mean!! It's ok, Ben is open about these sort of things, so you can be too! :D

Sorry bud Im not your type :lol:

Indeed, they won back to back european cups and not too many teams have done that.

Yep, history is important, but the present is the bread and butter!

Well said I guess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just thought id say congratulations to Argentina for topping FIFA's World Rankings. This will make the Socceroos victory over them in June even more sweet :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see where the heck FIFA pull their rankings from. Argentina are good, but the best team in the world? gimme a break

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just thought id say congratulations to Argentina for topping FIFA's World Rankings. This will make the Socceroos victory over them in June even more sweet :P

what??? how the hell did they get top of the rankings, what have they done?

The stupid thing is, the rankings is based on competitive matches, and Argentina's competitive matches are against little crap teams like Peru or Chile. In Europe we play much harder games.

Even USA is in top 10 which shows how messed up the rankings are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
what??? how the hell did they get top of the rankings, what have they done?

The stupid thing is, the rankings is based on competitive matches, and Argentina's competitive matches are against little crap teams like Peru or Chile. In Europe we play much harder games.

Even USA is in top 10 which shows how messed up the rankings are

Im not too happy with the ranking either. Australia is currently ranked 40th :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The US team at 10th... no offence to our american members but the US football team suck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The US team at 10th... no offence to our american members but the US football team suck

i think this is why no-one takes any notice of the world rankings. For me its about how well you do in the big tournaments and big games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed. Heaven only knows how FIFA work these out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
what??? how the hell did they get top of the rankings, what have they done?

The stupid thing is, the rankings is based on competitive matches, and Argentina's competitive matches are against little crap teams like Peru or Chile. In Europe we play much harder games.

Australia should be rated number 1 in that case:)

Seriously up until the 2 legged game against the South American 5th placed team Australia's world cup qualification campaign is a complete joke.

Its no disrespect to Australia, because they aren't a bad team, its just that every other team in their sector are pathetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Australia should be rated number 1 in that case:)

Seriously up until the 2 legged game against the South American 5th placed team Australia's world cup qualification campaign is a complete joke.

Its no disrespect to Australia, because they aren't a bad team, its just that every other team in their sector are pathetic.

I may be completely wrong, but I am sure Fifa took friendlies into account when deciding rankings, until just recently :eusa_think:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I may be completely wrong, but I am sure Fifa took friendlies into account when deciding rankings, until just recently :eusa_think:

Here is basically how the Fifa rating system works... This also explains my earlier question about Australia winning all their qualification games and still rating fairly low. Its since they are playing teams who would even stuggle in the special Olympics.

Read on...

The FIFA ranking system 1999-2006 is a calculation technique previously used by FIFA for ranking men's national teams in football. The ranking system was introduced by FIFA in 1999, as an update to an earlier system, and was replaced after the 2006 World Cup with a simplified system.

The rankings were fundamentally the same as a league system, though on a much larger, and more complex scale. Each team could potentially win a certain number of points in each match, though the number of points awarded in a league system depends solely on the result of the match, in the FIFA rankings far more had to be taken into account, as every team does not play all of the other teams home and away every season, as in most league systems. After the awarding of points, the teams were then organized into descending order by number of points, with the team with the most being the highest ranked.

The points allocated did not depend solely on whether a team wins, loses or draws their match, but also on the importance of the match and the strength of the opponent. A win over a weak opponent resulted in less points being awarded than a win over a much stronger one. This meant that a match would not result in the two or three points for a win and one for a draw, as is standard in most national league competitions. The calculation was more complex since it had to incorporate the other aforementioned factors.

One of the changes that was introduced when the ranking system was revised in 1999 was dubbed the "scaling up", where the points on offer for a match were roughly multiplied by ten, with the addition of more factors. In the 1999-2006 system teams could receive between zero and thirty points for a single match, and the leaders of the rankings had over eight hundred points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is basically how the Fifa rating system works... This also explains my earlier question about Australia winning all their qualification games and still rating fairly low. Its since they are playing teams who would even stuggle in the special Olympics.

Read on...

The FIFA ranking system 1999-2006 is a calculation technique previously used by FIFA for ranking men's national teams in football. The ranking system was introduced by FIFA in 1999, as an update to an earlier system, and was replaced after the 2006 World Cup with a simplified system.

The rankings were fundamentally the same as a league system, though on a much larger, and more complex scale. Each team could potentially win a certain number of points in each match, though the number of points awarded in a league system depends solely on the result of the match, in the FIFA rankings far more had to be taken into account, as every team does not play all of the other teams home and away every season, as in most league systems. After the awarding of points, the teams were then organized into descending order by number of points, with the team with the most being the highest ranked.

The points allocated did not depend solely on whether a team wins, loses or draws their match, but also on the importance of the match and the strength of the opponent. A win over a weak opponent resulted in less points being awarded than a win over a much stronger one. This meant that a match would not result in the two or three points for a win and one for a draw, as is standard in most national league competitions. The calculation was more complex since it had to incorporate the other aforementioned factors.

One of the changes that was introduced when the ranking system was revised in 1999 was dubbed the "scaling up", where the points on offer for a match were roughly multiplied by ten, with the addition of more factors. In the 1999-2006 system teams could receive between zero and thirty points for a single match, and the leaders of the rankings had over eight hundred points.

Cheers, Wez :thbup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn England were pathetic again last night against a country who's total population including women is smaller than the capacity of Old Trafford!!!

Im not sure why they are such a joke, its a combination of factors I recon.

Anyhow, at least now the cr@p international football is over and we can get on with the fight for supremacy in the Premiership & Europe!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think McLaren knows what he is doing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...