Pit Crew
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Massa

  • Rank
    My hands itch

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

9,954 profile views
  1. Alonso Daytona 500

    Fernando Alonso is likely to run the Daytona 500 in 2019. This is good and cool. Vroom. Zoom. Have a nice day.
  2. A STAR is BORN !

    The future champion is the driver who is next number one on the best team/in the best car. I'm not sure where Leclerc will be number one and where Ferrari will be the best team/with the best car, but I guess it could somehow happen. That isn't inherently bad. I have no problem with F1 being a constructors' championship. There are millions of drivers' championships out there. But I have a problem with a constructors' championship where the cars produced are so alike, so uninspiring, and so constrained by the rules (such as the refueling ban and the tire situation) as to be unable to take advantage of differing strengths and weaknesses and "over-perform." If you're going to be a championship where the results are almost entirely down to the cars and the teams, then let's see some iconic cars that really push the limits of performance and challenge what we think of as a conventional racing car, and let's see some teams be allowed to play with strategy. Dominance isn't a new problem, but at one time, there were more paths for a non-dominant team to steal one (and they did). And this being a car sport, not a driver sport, isn't new. But, at one time, the cars were actually interesting. Everyone's spending so much money to produce something only the true nerds of F1 can tell the difference from any of the other cars on the track, and there is nothing about them that is particularly innovative. They're the predictable, boring answer to predictable, boring regulations. They break track records in qualifying, but give us zero emotion whatsoever in so doing.
  3. Grand Prix Canada 2018

    You could solve almost all of F1's on-track issues by bringing back refueling. Q3 must be done on starting race fuel load. Hell, if you really need to keep the 100 kg of fuel limit, do it—just don't require them to run all 100 kg at once. Divide it up however you want, and get rid of any fuel flow rate limits. The truth is that you cannot have an exciting race unless, at some point, a faster car is behind a slower car. There are only two ways to accomplish this: (1) Strategy. Cars on alternate strategies shuffle the field; this means sometimes slower cars are ahead of faster cars. Yet F1 has no fuel strategy anymore, and it barely has any tire strategy (which, plainly, got to be a bit too dangerous, even if exciting, so refueling is the better route). IndyCar puts on some great races on tight tracks because of fuel strategy; the field will split on two-stop vs. three-stop and the three-stop drivers will push like hell to try to make up a full pit stop delta. I highly recommend watching the second Detroit race from this year as an example of how fun this is. If everyone did two stops or everyone did three stops, as they would in Formula One, the race would've been dull as s##t. Likewise, NASCAR is dull as s##t, too, because everyone just pits at the same time under caution, so, by all pitting the way the leader pits, no one can beat the leader because the leader clearly has the fastest car and if you run the leader's strategy, you have to beat the leader on pace, which you can't do. You desperately need fuel strategy. It's the only way to make a race interesting. (2) Have qualifying regulations that don't reflect the race regulations. But this is more expensive than strategy and less effective because it only puts potentially slower cars ahead of potentially faster cars at the start; it gets sorted out quickly. Still, it can help; IndyCar qualifies with extra boost for the Indy 500, and people "trim out" (taking all the downforce off the car to reduce drag—radical wing angles, all winglets removed from the undertray, etc.) like crazy, so the starting lineup for the Indy 500 hasn't really reflected the true pecking order for the race in this era of the rules. In F1's case, having Q3 done on starting race fuel load, as it used to be, can put a lighter, but overall slower, car on pole, and create some intrigue. Yes, it'd help if the aerodynamic regulations allowed cars to run closer together without issue, but the truth often do the cars actually run close together? Sure, Monaco and Montréal, but in most races, they're pretty spread apart. So, you can do all you want to facilitate overtaking, but if you don't do anything to create the situations when overtakes happen—faster cars trailing slower ones, as accomplished by fuel strategy—what good does it do?
  4. As promised, the schedule. Note that the race will not air on the NYC or Corpus Christi ABC affiliates. Check your local situation. All times Eastern. All events stream live on the ESPN app. The race may also stream live on WatchABC if your affiliate participates. All events are available for replay at any time on the ESPN app. Friday, June 8th FP1, 9:55 AM on ESPNU FP2, 1:55 PM on ESPNU Saturday, June 9th FP3, 10:55 AM on ESPN2 Qualifying, 1:55 PM on ESPNEWS Sunday, June 10th "On The Grid" pre-race show, 1:30 PM, ABC Race, 2:00 PM, ABC Encore presentation of race, 9:00 PM, ESPNEWS Monday, June 11th Encore presentation of race, 3:30 AM, ESPN2 Note that encore presentations have ad breaks; the live race on ABC will not. Shouldn't be too hard to synchronize your DVR to this well-publicized schedule of ESPN's unprecedented, comprehensive coverage of F1.
  5. McLaren IndyCar

    I'm sure you've read about this somewhere. Zak Brown wants to do a full season IndyCar program in 2019. He's meeting with Andretti Autosport and RLL Racing this weekend in Detroit to talk about a partnership. Gil de Ferran, an Indy 500 winner who coached Fernando Alonso, is there with him. Oh, and a representative from Alonso's management is there, too. A lot of American racing media thinks Alonso's really going to do this. But I also think a lot of American racing media have an incentive to try to hype up IndyCar as much as they can, and putting out, "Alonso will still do the 500, but the full-time McLaren car will be driven by Graham Rahal," isn't going to do that.
  6. Most boring race ever

    Yeah, though second place Sneva was on the same lap as winner Mears in that one (just 66 seconds back ;)). Alonso needs to cut the hyperbole. Most races in motorsports history have actually been really dull. "Exciting" races are more common now, but it still hasn't undone how truly awful most races were from the start of racing until the late 80s. The only excitement you ever had was if the car leading happened to be the one that failed.
  7. Dan's next move, Move or Stay?

    I hope everyone gets a chance to drive every car so we can know more facts.
  8. Relieved to be free from Leigh Diffey and Will Buxton, personally. Both were big ego a##holes who contributed little but loud noises. I hate that my beloved IndyCar is moving exclusively to NBC, so much so that I'll start attending the 500 at a great cost to never hear Diffey call the race I love most. David Hobbs and Steve Matchett were great for a while, but both way past it by 2017. Bob Varsha, too, has been awful in recent years when he's filled in for Diffey. Unfortunately, people get old. And, having spoken to Bob, I can tell you that "good guy" was your impression, but not mine. Maybe he was having an off-day or just didn't like me. Fair enough; I don't like myself, either! Also relieved to be free from ad breaks. And, for Spain and Monaco, every single session was on real TV—NBC never once did that (ESPN usually streams one practice session, but has been adding them all to TV. Monaco was even on real ESPN and ESPN2 rather than ESPNEWS). The ESPN coverage has ads on the encore presentations, though, so if you record those, you miss out. Anyway, I'll try to post the full ESPN F1 TV schedule with all sessions (did you know Formula 2 airs live on WatchESPN—even practice and qualifying?) and all encore presentations if that would help you synchronize your recordings. Not sure why your DVR isn't picking up the telecasts because ESPN isn't changing the start times or anything. They all air when the schedule says. They must be called something different in the guide from your cable provider.
  9. Race 4 - F1 2018 AZERBAIJAN GRAND PRIX

    I hope everyone wins the race!
  10. 2018 F1 season - discussion

    vroom zoom race car
  11. Williams seat - 2018

    RE: Wehrlein, I also find it interesting that Monisha Kaltenborn and Marcus Ericsson have both been saying positive things about Pascal in recent days/weeks. "Hard to work with" doesn't fit—the only person I know who didn't like working with Wehrlein was Esteban Ocon, who, incidentally, doesn't like working with Pérez. One wonders if perhaps Ocon is the problem. Also, people seem to forget that Wehrlein pulled himself from the early races because he didn't think he was at 100%. The media dragged him for it. Giovinazzi didn't even score points, but after one race, the media declared the ride Giovinazzi's permanently, and said Wehrlein had ruined his own career. Wehrlein took a big risk and a big hit to his reputation with the "experts" for the benefit of the team. Someone "hard to work with," I think, would've been selfish and insisted on staying in the car. Oh, well. He's off the grid in 2018, and I can only hope he'll get one more shot in the future, somehow.
  12. Williams seat - 2018

    (1) Correct. He was dropped because Ferrari needed a place for a junior driver, and Marcus Ericsson's backers bought into the team. (2) Wehrlein was doing just fine until Ericsson's backers bought into the team and fired Monisha Kaltenborn so that the underwhelming Ericsson could be the team leader. (3) The F1 paddock says that about everyone who isn't from the dominant ethnic/racial group of their home country. Wehrlein's not much different to work with from any other driver, but what is seen as "passion" or "fire" or "competitive spirit" in a white man is seen as disobedience and insubordination when it's someone else.
  13. Silly Season

    Not anymore! NASCAR once had 86 cars attempt for 43 spots—literally half the cars entered failed to qualify! More commonly, they'd get 50–55 entered for the 43. But now NASCAR has not only reduced the field size to 40, they usually only get 37–39 cars showing up. I think the most they had all year was 41 going for 40. The team owners formed an association, created "charters," and now chartered teams (1) are guaranteed a starting spot and (2) get paid a lot more per race than non-chartered teams. There are only 35 charters. So, for anyone beyond those 35 to show up is a bit of a money-loser. IndyCar also used to have more entries than spots (usually determined by safety—how many cars can safely pit at the track if, for example, all cars came in under a safety car at once) at many events in the CART days, and always at the Indy 500. But not anymore there, either. They do two days of qualifying, one of which is a "Bump Day" to set the 33 cars in the race, but there are only 33 entered now due to engine leasing rules, so it's very pointless. And sad. It used to be so much fun when cars got bumped out of the field.
  14. Kubica is back !!!

    His employer is a multi-million dollar business unit of a humongous, multinational corporation. One person cannot put that much pressure on them, even when there are relatively few drivers capable of winning in F1. The team knew the risks, knew that other teams didn't allow it, but determined that if that was what it took to get Kubica's services, then Kubica was worth it. And to imply that a racing driver wanting to race other types of cars is something on par with the decision-making of a hormonal adolescent would certainly be news to Jim Clark or Mario Andretti. There is more to life than what you do for work. Cycling on public roads is very dangerous. If I die or become incapacitated while cycling—which is an outcome that really does happen—my students will be without a teacher, and I like to think that my teaching adds value to their lives and the world around them. Maybe it will sound arrogant, but I think my job has more positive impact on the world than that of an F1 driver—my audience may be much smaller, and I may be paid much less, but I think people receiving a quality education is more important than people having an F1 race to watch. None of that stops me from cycling [vestibular migraines have, for the time being], though, because I have to live my life, too. There's no value in what I do if I have to destroy my life to do it, and there's no value in helping students realize what they can do if I set the example that they can't go on to do the things that make life livable. Plus, I won't do what I do well if I'm miserable from not being able to do things that help me recharge. And, plainly, I don't think anyone would say that I should stop cycling because it will cost my employer money trying to replace me if I get hit by a bus (sure, it may be harder to replace an F1 driver than it is to replace me, because fewer people are qualified to do what an F1 driver does, but there is still an excess of drivers with a Super License to the number of seats. Most of us have our "favorite" should-be-in-F1-but-is-instead-racing-sports-cars-or-sitting-at-home-or-doing-commentary-or-racing-IndyCar-or-what-ever driver). Like I said, you're totally entitled to your opinion that the team made the wrong choice to allow him to race, and that he made the wrong choice to race. But you can't say that the choice was wrong because he let his team down—his team allowed him to do it. If they didn't want him to, they could've stopped it, and Kubica, not having any other competitive rides open to him at that time, wouldn't have walked away. And if they didn't want him to, and he refused to drive for them, they could've hired any number of other drivers. Obviously, on everyone's free will, they decided that it was in both of their best interests to allow it. You act like Kubica wanted to throw his F1 career away. It seems to me that someone spending countless years trying to overcome a physical limitation just to race in F1 again, when he could have easily raced some other type of car for the rest of time, would have felt the exact opposite. He determined it was worth the risk, the same way it was worth the risk to drive in F1 in the first place and potentially be hit in the head by a spring like the driver he might replace, or worse.
  15. Kubica is back !!!

    Yes, Kubica had a contract year-round. But that contract allowed him to race that rally car. So, you can't really argue, "BUT HE LET HIS EMPLOYER DOWN!!!!" when his employer allowed him to do that. You're more than welcome to the opinion that teams should not allow drivers to race outside F1; that's up to you. But if the team and driver didn't agree to that (which they did not), you can't try to use the team's interests against the driver. I'm also curious what you do for work and if you spend all your free time in the way you think creates the least risk or even the most benefit to your employer...