Clicky

Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jenson_Rules

Pizzonia Confirmed For China And Japan

Recommended Posts

I didn't say that because that is not the case. You are still wrong, I am just really fed up of arguing my point to a kid who can't accept the facts. I have no interest in pursuing this argument further. My signature is not wrong, and I also have no interest in pursuing that argument further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the case, I asked for some evidence and you said you would find it, however you did not.

Trying to win an argument by saying I am a kid and childish is very weak and only makes my point stronger, especially as I have accepted several things throughout this thread, but you can't accept the fact that you might have got what I was asking wrong!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest Kay_zee I think you should stop right there now because you arguing is childish in itself. Kaisersalsek has a point to argue about you are just being very immature about the whole situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To be honest Kay_zee I think you should stop right there now because you arguing is childish in itself. Kaisersalsek has a point to argue about you are just being very immature about the whole situation.

:huh:

And I have a point as well, I asked for some evidence and then later when I asked again, apparently I was asking something different.

How come I am not allowed to argue my point but someone else is? I have accepted several things in this thread and would like the same sort of reply back without being reminded how old I am, I am fully aware of that fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kay_zee, no matter how much you try to spur me on to re-start the argument, I have already said I have proven my point and I do not wish to pursue this argument any further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:huh:

And I have a point as well, I asked for some evidence and then later when I asked again, apparently I was asking something different.

How come I am not allowed to argue my point but someone else is? I have accepted several things in this thread and would like the same sort of reply back without being reminded how old I am, I am fully aware of that fact.

As far as I am concerned Kay_zee personally I have already stated my intentions to say the end to this arguement because it is very much one sided with no one replying. How about we end it and just concentrate on the actual topic here....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kay_zee, no matter how much you try to spur me on to re-start the argument, I have already said I have proven my point and I do not wish to pursue this argument any further.

Well you keep replying, so you must want to say something.

I am asking where the quote is I asked for, if it doesn't exist then just say so and then there is nothing further to post about, I don't appreciate being told I am bending words when I am simply asking for the original evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To be honest Kay_zee I think you should stop right there now because you arguing is childish in itself. Kaisersalsek has a point to argue about you are just being very immature about the whole situation.

You are braver than most of us :) Their both set on their view of events and not likely to change it apparently from posts <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are braver than most of us :) Their both set on their view of events and not likely to change it apparently from posts <_<

I have said I will change my view point if the evidence is posted. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fine, I'll justify it for you, the simple minded idiot. Nick is unhappy about not racing, he is therefore unhappy about the fact that Williams is not allowing him to race because he is fit, Frank = Williams

I am not replying in this topic anymore. The fact you can't comprehend something so simple is beyond me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fine, I'll justify it for you, the simple minded idiot. Nick is unhappy about not racing, he is therefore unhappy about the fact that Williams is not allowing him to race because he is fit, Frank = Williams

I am not replying in this topic anymore. The fact you can't comprehend something so simple is beyond me.

There is nothing in the comment about not being allowed to race by Williams, so like I said it is just another assumption and not a fact like we are both doing. :)

An example: There may be something in his BMW contract that states he won't race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fine, I'll justify it for you, the simple minded idiot. Nick is unhappy about not racing, he is therefore unhappy about the fact that Williams is not allowing him to race because he is fit, Frank = Williams

I am not replying in this topic anymore. The fact you can't comprehend something so simple is beyond me.

That sounds pretty logical to me I do not understand why any sort of 'evidence' is needed apart from the above here. You may not change your point of view which everyone can and should respect but arguing to a creditable member who hasn't done anything wrong is not really the right way to do things. I am pretty sure the button we all press to post something doesn't give you the choice to argue instead of reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, I said I wouldn't reply anymore but it seems the war is over

I would find it very odd if there were something in his BMW contract that states he won't race... surely they would want nick to be testing their new V8 engine, through the Williams platform if possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That sounds pretty logical to me I do not understand why any sort of 'evidence' is needed apart from the above here. You may not change your point of view which everyone can and should respect but arguing to a creditable member who hasn't done anything wrong is not really the right way to do things. I am pretty sure the button we all press to post something doesn't give you the choice to argue instead of reply.

We all argue, sorry but if I am arguing with her point of view she too is with me. I don't see why you have a problem with me arguing, but think someone else can argue with me too. I may be arguing too much but I do not appreciate being called a kid or childish because I am fully aware of my age.

ok, I said I wouldn't reply anymore but it seems the war is over

I would find it very odd if there were something in his BMW contract that states he won't race... surely they would want nick to be testing their new V8 engine, through the Williams platform if possible.

Hey, don't think its anything personal against you!! I am disagreeing with your opinion, but not you as a member! :)

I am just saying that it is not a fact, as there are several different reasons why he could not be racing and lets face it - F1 has become a very political sport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no, most kids of your age don't want to be reminded of that fact ;)

The politics in F1 is very unfortunate, very unfortunate indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no, most kids of your age don't want to be reminded of that fact ;)

The politics in F1 is very unfortunate, very unfortunate indeed.

Well I don't mind outside of an argument, but in the middle of one it can feel quite condescending and I will accept that Frank not allowing him to drive is a possibility like I said earlier, however at this stage it is not a fact and yes he deserves the drive more than Pizzonia, but if Pizzonia will be their test driver again next season then it could be of some use to let him drive rather than someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

geez, looks like a heck of a cat fight I missed :lol:

I think I can settle this though. There is a story about this on f1central.net where Nick basically says that he conducted simulator tests, but found out he could only cope with loads of 50%, hence he was deemed unfit, and that's why he cannot race this year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now now girls :dam::shakehead:

Because Pizzonia has a contract to race when the 2 drivers can't?
That is very unlikely Kay, if there was there would be no reason for allowing the rosberg rumour. Nico himself has said he was hoping for the drive but Frank decided against it. It is probably due to his inexperience, though I agree with kss it seems to be a pretty bad decision.
do you LIVE in a cave?? Nick CAN race.

There again we have to go by what we know. If Nick himself comes out and says he failed a fitness test, you just have to accept it. Unless he is under some kind of legal gag order (wild speculation) there is no reason for him to lie on that issue.

So you show no gratitude that Frank let him go where he wanted to be instead of forcing him to drive, which he could have - Button admitted the contract he had was watertight.
Well Frank got loads of cash. Frank came out pretty well from the deal, how embarrassing do you think it would have been for Button to drive for Williams next year and have to take back all his criticism. Button staying with BAR was inevitable, Frank took the best deal he could. He did not do anything very noble.
To be honest Kay_zee I think you should stop right there now because you arguing is childish in itself. Kaisersalsek has a point to argue about you are just being very immature about the whole situation.

someday kid someday you will get it from me :furious:

no, most kids of your age don't want to be reminded of that fact

no offence kss but as far as I remember you aren't quite 65 yet ;) .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did state that the Pizzonia contract was only a possibility as it would have been a compromise for Pizzonia seeing that at the end of last year he was promised that it was more than likely he would get the seat.

"I have conducted some simulator tests," Heidfeld said, "and it was determined that I am only able to withstand loads of fifty per cent. Unfortunately, because of this, I cannot race again this year."

Meanwhile Autosport reports that Williams' technical director Sam Michael has denied speculation that Heidfeld and the team had fallen out over his 2006 deal to drive for BMW. "Our relationship has finished on good terms," said the Australian."We hold Nick in high regard and wish him all the best for the future."

Appears Nick isn't fit and it isn't Williams stopping him from driving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

O I cant wait for Team BMW to Drill Williams in the near future!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GO TEAM BMW!!! Never thought i would say that as i hate BMW, but if they beat williams id be very happy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

me too!

Fair enough if nick's not fit - that's the media lying for you! I didn't think he'd recover from a cracked shoulder blade that quickly and thought the media about him being ok was a bit odd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...