Turkey

[Silver_Arrows 0]

I\\now\\understand\\where\\you\\are\\coming\\from,\\this\\particular\\point\\demonstrates\\just\\that. You\'re\\F1\\knowledge\\is\\abit\\limited\\it\\shows\\in\\your\\postings\\.I\\recommend\\reading\\more\\on\\the\\subject\\matter.

No\\use\\coming\\down\\from\\the\\high\\clouds \\again

I have read plenty on it thanks, and I know quiet what I am talking about. Can\'t see how being an arrogant jerkoff is going to make you more right, but meh although I am an Alonso fan in general, I do not mindlessly worship anyone like you mindlessly worship raikkonen so I guess stupid posts like that are about your best response. Amusing at best.

[Rainmaster 7]

I have read plenty on it thanks, and I know quiet what I am talking about. Can\'t see how being an arrogant jerkoff is going to make you more right, but meh although I am an Alonso fan in general, I do not mindlessly worship anyone like you mindlessly worship raikkonen so I guess stupid posts like that are about your best response. Amusing at best.

Careful now, you may have a bad case of maureism there, if you start walking a lot, consult a doctor priest.

[dribbler 6]

Careful now, you may have a bad case of maureism there, if you start walking a lot, consult a doctor priest.

[BradSpeedMan 6]

Dear Brad, you don't need to quote such bollocks to get me agreeing that Kimi is a good driver; I agree that he is but Keke should know better than relying on the past and where Kimi is at the moment in the standings relative to the others. What happened last year when Lewis was 'plotting a solid course' to the title? Dear old Kimi came from way back and nicked a deserved crown. What happens if McLaren keep nibbling away at Ferrari and start to get an upper hand? What happens if Lewis wins in Monaco and Kimi bins it/blows up/can't be bothered again?

Now, does that make sense?

to be fair Dribs, Kimi is not Lewis. The church of Hamilton will protest otherwise as I suspect the high priest Mike will have some muti and spells in store to close the gap to the leader come the next races.

as I said.... Kimi is not Lewis, and no one else has the potential to close a 26 point gap as quickly, once the Iceman is on fire. This may seem like ramblings, but herein lies great truth

[BradSpeedMan 6]

I have read plenty on it thanks, and I know quiet what I am talking about. Can\'t see how being an arrogant jerkoff is going to make you more right, but meh although I am an Alonso fan in general, I do not mindlessly worship anyone like you mindlessly worship raikkonen so I guess stupid posts like that are about your best response. Amusing at best.

I can't believe a Kimi fan like Freaky can associate with a nincompoop like this....

[Autumnpuma 0]

to be fair Dribs, Kimi is not Lewis. The church of Hamilton will protest otherwise as I suspect the high priest Mike will have some muti and spells in store to close the gap to the leader come the next races.

as I said.... Kimi is not Lewis, and no one else has the potential to close a 26 point gap as quickly, once the Iceman is on fire. This may seem like ramblings, but herein lies great truth

It will be an interesting battle to watch.

[yurp 0]

Now - I don't really hold an opinion on either side of this little debate BUT...

That one particularly made me laugh. Kimi isn\'t even close to being on Senna\'s level. Also, Alonso didn\'t have the benifit of team orders, he just had the benifit of a team mate who wasn\'t even close to being a match for him. If you put a person onto a pedestal on which they clearly don\'t belong then you should expect to have your opinions challenged. You slag off Alonso a fair bit, yet you expect your own assertions about raikkonen to be unchallenged. Amusing

A tad combatative, but nothing overtly personal - certainly opinionated, but that's what we bring to these forums no? Would like to see some evidence to back up these beliefs.

I\now\understand\where\you\are\coming\from,\this\particular\point\demonstrates\just\that. You're\F1\knowledge\is\abit\limited\it\shows\in\your\postings\.I\recommend\reading\more\on\the\subject\matter.

No\use\coming\down\from\the\high\clouds \again

Now Brad - naughty naughty - that's just avoiding the discussion and serving up vitriol. That kinda bugs me, from a member I had admired (and still admire) for well thought through posts. You should offer evidence to support your argument rather than lashing out. No matter how much you disagree - evidence to make your points garners more simpathy.

I have read plenty on it thanks, and I know quiet what I am talking about. Can\'t see how being an arrogant jerkoff is going to make you more right, but meh although I am an Alonso fan in general, I do not mindlessly worship anyone like you mindlessly worship raikkonen so I guess stupid posts like that are about your best response. Amusing at best.

Now we can see Silver_Arrows geting p**sed off - which (from my point of view) is a natural reaction. Infact I did the same not so long ago when I felt an adversary (in that discussion - but not now ) was avoiding the points I was making by dishing out a fat (but funny) serving of sarcasm.

Careful now, you may have a bad case of maureism there, if you start walking a lot, consult a doctor priest.

Now that was in return for Silver_Arrows getting testy and citing maureism in this case is (I think) further still out of the context of the discussion at hand. It also follows Brad's lead of avoiding discussion and resorting to sarcasm.

For both sides - disagree by all means, but let's do it in an adult fashion. I think both of you (Silver & Brad) have valid arguments to a certain degree and the truth probably lies somewhere in between, but when it comes to vitriol, I'm persuaded by neither. Team orders is a touchy subject but it can be discussed without getting personal.

Brad & Rainmaster - why is Silver_Arrows wrong?

Silver_Arrows - why is Brad wrong?

[Oli 1]

You sound like a marriage counselor.....

[yurp 0]

You sound like a marriage counselor.....

I prefer the term diplomat

[BradSpeedMan 6]

Now - I don't really hold an opinion on either side of this little debate BUT...

A tad combatative, but nothing overtly personal - certainly opinionated, but that's what we bring to these forums no? Would like to see some evidence to back up these beliefs.

Now Brad - naughty naughty - that's just avoiding the discussion and serving up vitriol. That kinda bugs me, from a member I had admired (and still admire) for well thought through posts. You should offer evidence to support your argument rather than lashing out. No matter how much you disagree - evidence to make your points garners more simpathy.

Now we can see Silver_Arrows geting p**sed off - which (from my point of view) is a natural reaction. Infact I did the same not so long ago when I felt an adversary (in that discussion - but not now ) was avoiding the points I was making by dishing out a fat (but funny) serving of sarcasm.

Now that was in return for Silver_Arrows getting testy and citing maureism in this case is (I think) further still out of the context of the discussion at hand. It also follows Brad's lead of avoiding discussion and resorting to sarcasm.

For both sides - disagree by all means, but let's do it in an adult fashion. I think both of you (Silver & Brad) have valid arguments to a certain degree and the truth probably lies somewhere in between, but when it comes to vitriol, I'm persuaded by neither. Team orders is a touchy subject but it can be discussed without getting personal.

Brad & Rainmaster - why is Silver_Arrows wrong?

Silver_Arrows - why is Brad wrong?

Mr Adams, I do NOT NEED TO BE LECTURED!!!!! If I feel to be sarcastic, thats what I want to be!!!!!!!! and you're just a tad too preachy!!!!

nuff said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh, by the way, yes, you're still a good bud in my eyes!

[yurp 0]

Mr Adams, I do NOT NEED TO BE LECTURED!!!!! If I feel to be sarcastic, thats what I want to be!!!!!!!! and you're just a tad too preachy!!!!

nuff said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh, by the way, yes, you're still a good bud in my eyes!

I knew I'd catch shrapnel again - I seem to be a magnet for the stuff - anyone seen Iron Man yet?

okay - handbags at dawn it is! you rascle you - sometimes a man must be a man... and do manly things and stuff.

[BradSpeedMan 6]

I knew I'd catch shrapnel again - I seem to be a magnet for the stuff - anyone seen Iron Man yet?

okay - handbags at dawn it is! you rascle you - sometimes a man must be a man... and do manly things and stuff.

thought I'de celebrate my birthday on Sunday with a movie...yeah, I know, very boring.... and saw Iron Man,! LOVED IT! Besides the Hulk and Spiderman 1, probably one of the best comic adaptions to date! lovely stuff!!!

[Rainmaster 7]

Now - I don't really hold an opinion on either side of this little debate BUT...

A tad combatative, but nothing overtly personal - certainly opinionated, but that's what we bring to these forums no? Would like to see some evidence to back up these beliefs.

Now Brad - naughty naughty - that's just avoiding the discussion and serving up vitriol. That kinda bugs me, from a member I had admired (and still admire) for well thought through posts. You should offer evidence to support your argument rather than lashing out. No matter how much you disagree - evidence to make your points garners more simpathy.

Now we can see Silver_Arrows geting p**sed off - which (from my point of view) is a natural reaction. Infact I did the same not so long ago when I felt an adversary (in that discussion - but not now ) was avoiding the points I was making by dishing out a fat (but funny) serving of sarcasm.

Now that was in return for Silver_Arrows getting testy and citing maureism in this case is (I think) further still out of the context of the discussion at hand. It also follows Brad's lead of avoiding discussion and resorting to sarcasm.

For both sides - disagree by all means, but let's do it in an adult fashion. I think both of you (Silver & Brad) have valid arguments to a certain degree and the truth probably lies somewhere in between, but when it comes to vitriol, I'm persuaded by neither. Team orders is a touchy subject but it can be discussed without getting personal.

Brad & Rainmaster - why is Silver_Arrows wrong?

Silver_Arrows - why is Brad wrong?

To be honest I wasn't involved in the debate, it was just a joke, I don't even no what they were debating! I'm sure it was very interesting though.

Oh and the joke wasn't actually against silver arrows either...