Quiet One, on 30 March 2012 - 12:02 PM, said:
Allow me to disagree. And disavow the "Massa has never been the same since his accident in 2009" in the meantime.
1. The obvious: it is impossible to measure "what kind of driver he would have been if not for the accident". I assume we are talking about mental consequences, not physical ones, of course (a driver without an arm will obviously never be "that kind of driver if not for the accident"). Post accident trauma is like talking about the sex of the angels.
2. Of the few things that can be objectively taken into account when talking about post accident traumas, one is how conscious you were during the accident itself. In Massa's case, he never knew how bad it was or even that he had an accident until he woke up in the hospital, and by that time he already knew that it was horrific, but not particularly "traumatic".
Basically, he got hit in the head badly and passed out as far as his inconscius can process. Consciusly, yes, it was a near death accident. But if that affects a driver, then he is also conscius that he is scared and that it is limiting his performance. In Kubica's case, his Rally accident was even more terrible, and he was partially conscious through it, and in any case the recovery process alone is enough to traumatise anybody. Yet, as for the moment of the accident itself, probably would have been less "traumatic" than his Canada accident in F1, when he was conscious all the time while travelling upside down in a disintegrating car at top speed.
3. Many drivers suffered horrific accidents and it didn't stop them from having perfectly normal F1 careers. Barrichello had one such accident and close to the death of his beloved friend Ayrton. Maybe he would have ended up being a 9 times WDC champion and we would be now saying "remember that german guy that once drove along the great Rubinho? Whatshisname, Shoemaker?". Rubinho always admitted the trauma (curiously, he always mentioneed Ayrton's dead more of a trauma than his own accident), yet, he still went on to pursue the longest F1 driver career. Not too shabby.
4. Schumi, broke his legs. Alonso's car was disintegrated at Interlagos, Perez, huge frontal shunt at Monaco, Kubica himself and his Montreal accident, etc. As we cannot possible know how much better they could have been without those accidents, it is impossible to measure the impact. But they certainly kept having quite succesful careers, accidents or not.
I think if Kubica can solve his physical issues, he will be more than fit to keep being one of the greatest drivers on the grid. I also think that Massa's accident is not to blame for his lack of performance. Even if we admit that different drivers are affected differently, then the mere fact that his performance was so affected puts his mental fitness for a sport like F1 into question.
Maybe so. But on the basis of the slow to none existent progress he's making currently, I think my point is valid. Massa's recovery was quite quick. He only missed half a season and was back to start 2010. Of course, I'm not saying their situations are similar. But if Kubica did have any chance of returning, I think we'd have seen a heck of a lot more progress being made. Okay, there's been sketchy reports of him driving cars, but nothing has been officially confirmed.
I think in a way you underestimate the seriousness of his injuries. This wasn't simply a case of Schumacher breaking his legs or whatever. Even his Canada crash was far, far worse that his rally accident. You only have to look at his injuries - sure his Canada crash was probably at a much greater speed, but thanks to the safety of F1 cars, he escaped basically unharmed. F1 crashes and rally crashes are fundamentally different things - you can't really compare the two. Using the logic that he was fine in an F1 crash, so he'll therefore be fine in this is a bit foolish.
The sad fact of the matter is that rally cars are not, and never have been, as safe as Formula One cars. It's probably fair to say that it is much more likely a driver would get seriously injured in a rally crash than in an F1 crash - and Kubica is living proof of that. Again - it is completely different situations. You can't compare a rally stage to an F1 track, both have different dangers, and besides, it is easier to make an F1 track safe whereas it is much more challenging to do the same for a rally stage. Aside from maybe Monaco, on a rally stage you are much closer to hitting something hard than you are on an F1 track. Run off zones don't exist in rally.
I know Alguersuari got a lot of stick for saying what he did - but if there is any truth to that, then you're kidding yourself if you think there's any hope of him returning. The seriousness of his injuries, and the fact that he's been away from the c#ckpit for so long now...yeah, it doesn't look good.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love for more than anything to see Kubica return, for the same feel-good reason that it was a fantastic story to see Massa return after his injuries. I haven't got an agenda against his return or anything.
But from the little we have heard it seems fairly likely he is done in F1 for good. Do you not think if there was any chance of him returning at all, it'd be a major story? No doubt they'd try and make a big deal out of it - but as it is, we haven't heard anything since he rebroke his leg - and that in itself points to the fact that everyone really knows that there's zero chance of him coming back, to the point that eventually talk of his return will be forgotten. He'll maybe return to race in some form of motorsport one day, but I very much doubt he'll ever return to F1 as a race driver anyway.
Edited by JHS18, 31 March 2012 - 03:51 PM.